Replies: 48
| visibility 1
|
All-In [40977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42991
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 3:27 PM
|
|
From 2012-2015 247 sports
Tigers 23,15,24,10 - Ave 18 Coots 15,18,16,19 - Ave 17
What went wrong with the coots? LOL I wonder what El Cids rankings were.
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64755]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89076
Joined: 3/27/01
|
deCootments or academic casualties***
Jul 5, 2016, 3:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15617]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21442
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: deCootments or academic casualties***
Jul 5, 2016, 3:33 PM
|
|
Academic casualties seems like a reach to me. Maybe they just didn't graduate HS?
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16460]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12839
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Seriously, SCar's classes the last four years have been
Jul 5, 2016, 3:47 PM
|
|
decimated with non-qualifiers, transfers, and roster cuts. Those rankings would be in the 30's or worse were they to retroactively assign values after a few years, based solely on attendance, not productivity.
Our recruiting staff, however, does a much better job of assuring that whoever commits is likely to make it to campus also, as well as keep them on campus for years in the system once they do arrive. It's almost a polar opposite of SCar in that respect, as our recent on field results help show.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15617]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21442
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: Seriously, SCar's classes the last four years have been
Jul 6, 2016, 7:42 AM
|
|
Agreed, but I think our staff offers a higher academic quality athlete, staying away from those who don't seem to possess the academic skills to make it at Clemson. Take a look at our graduation rate, and it seems pretty obvious that we place more emphasis on the classroom. usuc, not so much.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64755]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89076
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9557
Joined: 12/18/13
|
Just for funsies
Jul 5, 2016, 3:51 PM
|
|
I looked, and they only signed 14 more players than us in that 4 year span. I honestly would have guessed more.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54259]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43671
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Probation forced them to cut scholarships by 6 over a 3 year
Jul 5, 2016, 9:31 PM
|
|
period during that stretch or there would have been more.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9557
Joined: 12/18/13
|
Good catch.***
Jul 6, 2016, 7:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3978]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3822
Joined: 8/6/13
|
Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 4:02 PM
|
|
The issue is you are looking at 247 rankings. Take a look at rivals and ESPN. Those rankings show a bigger gap. And if you look at results I'd say rivals has been the best when it comes to player ratings and team rankings
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42991
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I've always heard people say that about rivals
Jul 5, 2016, 4:24 PM
|
|
but there is zero data to support that rivals is better at predicting. Sure you can find a team where they are better and I'll bet I can find another team where they were worse. Rivals was just better at advertising and putting the information out there in a nice orderly fashion. 247 seems to do a better job now or advertising etc. Rivals started the whole "insider" knowledge scheme and got people to pay for their information, but it really wasn't better information. David Hood has as much and better information than any of the other outlets.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15617]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21442
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: I've always heard people say that about rivals
Jul 6, 2016, 7:45 AM
|
|
I agree that Hood seems to do a better and more thorough job of getting things right than many others. He may be ours, but he is pretty darned good, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3978]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3822
Joined: 8/6/13
|
Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 4:11 PM
|
|
My bad man I misread your post. Thought those were team rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 4:19 PM
|
|
Mine are the team rankings...from all 4 sites.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42991
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: I used 2012-2015 since the 2016 recruits haven't played yet
Jul 5, 2016, 4:33 PM
|
|
...but you didn't pull the right numbers it doesn't appear:
you had this: Tigers 23,15,24,10 (average = 18) Coots: Coots 15,18,16,19 (average = 17)
247 actually has this: Tigers 15,15,17,9 (average = 14) Coots: 17,20,19,19 (average = 18.75)
http://247sports.com/Season/2016-Football/CompositeTeamRankings
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: I used 2012-2015 since the 2016 recruits haven't played yet
Jul 5, 2016, 4:36 PM
|
|
Note, 2012, Clemson was ranked #15, not #23 as you have down
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17075
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I used 2012-2015 since the 2016 recruits haven't played yet
Jul 5, 2016, 4:45 PM
|
|
Do you notice the 23 directly under the 15 by any chance?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2115]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3061
Joined: 6/19/10
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54259]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43671
Joined: 11/17/03
|
I think JC Shurburt is a big reason 247 estimates of the
Jul 5, 2016, 9:39 PM
[ in reply to Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots ] |
|
Coots recruiting is high. But, your last one showing Scout's rankings proves one of the things I have said many times on here. Every player we recruit has a lower evaluation on Scout than all of the others. I cannot remember a Clemson player being rated higher on Scout than say Rivals, ESPN, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13069]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22386
Joined: 4/24/04
|
We've recruited better than 18th. Some of the services count too many recruits
Jul 5, 2016, 4:12 PM
|
|
which values quantity (sec over signing) vs quality.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17075
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 4:32 PM
|
|
Difference between playing in the SEC and ACC
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
The SEC is just Bama followed by a bunch of mediocre teams with terrible QB's***
Jul 5, 2016, 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9557
Joined: 12/18/13
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14168
Joined: 6/27/14
|
funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 4:46 PM
[ in reply to Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots ] |
|
and i mean NO ONE, considers that to be true at all. usuck would have a chance against wake, and possibly bc. probably much like the wake vs bc game last yr. every other acc team would beat you. unless of course someone decided to hand you the game like carolina did last yr.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17075
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 4:53 PM
|
|
I was being funny but we did beat the ACC coastal champion and only lost to the ACC Champion by 5 points...
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64755]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89076
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Whatever helps you sleep at night princess***
Jul 5, 2016, 5:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14168
Joined: 6/27/14
|
Re: funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 5:42 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
well, i almost banged....fill in the blank. is that seriously what usuck hangs their hat on? you lost to the f'n citadel. you don't hear tigers saying "we only lost by 5" in championship do you? #### no. do you know why?? because a loss is a loss. that's by far the most absurd statement ever
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17075
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 6:29 PM
|
|
Actually I've read that line a lot on here...
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 704
Joined: 9/7/14
|
Ive heard that a lot actually.
Jul 5, 2016, 9:56 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
Along with "Bama got lucky" and "the better team lost."
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: Ive heard that a lot actually.
Jul 6, 2016, 8:56 AM
|
|
Good lord man can you make it any more obvious you are a shamecock lover? Why don't you just admit it already, it's not like you're fooling anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9557
Joined: 12/18/13
|
Don't forget only lost to the SoCon runner up by 1.
Jul 5, 2016, 5:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
While listing accomplishments.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 5:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
You mean by 5 points when scoring a touchdown with ONE second left in the game? UNC handed that game to you on a platter. Wait, let's talk Citadel. Those previous excuses are getting real old as neither hold a lot of water. Idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7050]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6382
Joined: 9/21/04
|
Re: funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 9:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
Did you actually watch the games ? UNC dominated you and gave the game away with interceptions and the UNC dominated you and gave the game away with interceptions in the red zone. You were dead in the water against Clemson, we just took the foot off the gas and let it become close
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: funny how no one
Jul 5, 2016, 9:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
We also barely beat Syracuse. We also went undefeated untill the natty. You also went 3-9. A W is a W. We all know we dominated that game but y'all had some plays and put up a fight. We beat plenty of ranked teams and dominated every game we played.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54259]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43671
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Dude, you lost to The Citadel. You beat UNC game one of the
Jul 5, 2016, 9:53 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
year, when they threw the ball STRAIGHT to SKAI,( I mean, he would have had to have ducked not to get hit in the chest)not once , but TWICE, and then a third time to somebody else. And then, if their idiot coach had not for some unknown reason put his best tailback, who was running it down your throat, on the bench, you would have lost that game after being what, PLUS 4 in the turnover department. As far as our game, it was our 10th in a row. 10th. We gave you the last 7. You never, after we went up 10, had the ball with a chance to take the lead. Not once. And, you know, you spent two weeks preparing for us. The Citadel game is proof of that. And if you didn't spend the two weeks preparing for us, what does that say about your loss to The Citadel?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54259]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43671
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Dude, you lost to The Citadel. You beat UNC game one of the
Jul 5, 2016, 10:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: funny how no one ] |
|
year, when they threw the ball STRAIGHT to SKAI,( I mean, he would have had to have ducked not to get hit in the chest)not once , but TWICE, and then a third time to somebody else. And then, if their idiot coach had not for some unknown reason put his best tailback, who was running it down your throat, on the bench, you would have lost that game after being what, PLUS 4 in the turnover department. As far as our game, it was our 10th in a row. 10th. We gave you the last 7. You never, after we went up 10, had the ball with a chance to take the lead. Not once. And, you know, you spent two weeks preparing for us. The Citadel game is proof of that. And if you didn't spend the two weeks preparing for us, what does that say about your loss to The Citadel?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1087]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1276
Joined: 7/9/02
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 5:58 PM
[ in reply to Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots ] |
|
LOL difference between playing what??????? That's pretty lame, even for you. THere isn't a single team in the $EC least that could win the Atlantic Div in the ACC.Youve got Alabama and LSWHO, the rest are about even....and average. Take that crap somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1087]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1276
Joined: 7/9/02
|
Didn't the second place team in our division
Jul 5, 2016, 11:22 PM
[ in reply to Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots ] |
|
beat the first place team in your division 27-2 at their place? We could only hope to play such a soft schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24403]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9858
Joined: 10/7/15
|
Coaching also, perhaps?
Jul 5, 2016, 4:38 PM
|
|
I seem to recall several players that came to us as 3 stars that performed equal to or better than some 4 (and even 5) star recruits (Jarrett, Norton, Dodd to name a few)... think it says something about the ability of the coaches to get them to a higher level, perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
247 rankings are terrible in terms for Clemson.***
Jul 5, 2016, 4:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: 247 rankings are terrible in terms for Clemson.***
Jul 5, 2016, 4:46 PM
|
|
Bad this is they aren't the worst of the 4...Scout's are absolutely off-the-wall bad.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: 247 rankings are terrible in terms for Clemson.***
Jul 5, 2016, 5:56 PM
|
|
Clemson 4 13 14 14 Usuck 19 17 16 19
This is Rivals. (2015-2012) I still think they coots got a bump just for being $EC.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1330]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2226
Joined: 8/6/14
|
Re: 247 is just a composite of the various sites, incl Scout.***
Jul 5, 2016, 7:56 PM
|
|
Not exactly. 247 posts their own rankings as well as a 4-ranking composite. They'd be wise to leave Scout out of there, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 704
Joined: 9/7/14
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: Previous 4 years recruiting Tigers vs Coots
Jul 5, 2016, 9:42 PM
|
|
Our 24 rank should be much higher just with how DW has been! Crazy how things work out. DW is deff the best from that class. The year before Gallman turned out as good as any 5*.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 48
| visibility 1
|
|
|