|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1,251
|
CU Medallion [54122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43648
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Boys, can you imagine if we would have lost to the coots where we had a
6
6
May 7, 2024, 9:35 PM
|
|
guy called out at second BECAUSE THE UMP SIGNALED A WALK......Not as bad as that homer that was called a foul....but if I was their coach I would be just as mad....
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1387]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 997
Joined: 12/28/06
|
Re: Boys, can you imagine if we would have lost to the coots where we had a
2
May 7, 2024, 9:36 PM
|
|
Why? It was the right call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1387]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 997
Joined: 12/28/06
|
Re: Boys, can you imagine if we would have lost to the coots where we had a
3
May 7, 2024, 9:37 PM
|
|
Ump did not signal a walk. He just didn’t know himself. The batter lost count and took off to first
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43648
Joined: 11/17/03
|
I was listening on the radio and the announcers said the umps had signalled
2
May 7, 2024, 9:40 PM
|
|
a 3-2 count before the play....called a ball...so the guy went to second. It took a long time for them to sort it out so the UMPS must have been confused...I WAS NOT WATCHING IT. But with the blown calls I have seen with my own two eyes this year, I had no reason to doubt the announcers..
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1387]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 997
Joined: 12/28/06
|
Re: I was listening on the radio and the announcers said the umps had signalled
1
May 7, 2024, 9:48 PM
|
|
I think both of us are right. Right call in the end. And your point about missed calls this year by umps.
In the end, glad for once it went our way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43648
Joined: 11/17/03
|
It sort of reminded me of the basketball game we had where the other team
1
May 7, 2024, 10:26 PM
|
|
goal tended,and Girard got the rebound and laid it in. We got 2 points off of the goal tending call...AND GIRARD REBOUNDED AND LAID IT IN ANYWAY...IMMEDIATELY. Then, about three minutes later during a timeout they reviewed it and ruled it WAS NOT GOAL TENDING and took two points away from us....Beat all I have ever seen....THey way the explained it on the radio was that the ump signalled 3-2 and then called a ball..ump told the runner to go to 2nd where he was tagged out...then they reviewed it....Blah blah blah... Wish I would have seen it live....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29050]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36110
Joined: 8/28/00
|
Just watched it on replay
1
May 7, 2024, 10:32 PM
|
|
Clearly it was 2-2 prior to the pitch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43648
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Yes it was. But the announcers said the ump indicated it was 3-2, and I
1
May 7, 2024, 10:35 PM
|
|
assume that is why it took them so long to sort it out.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29050]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36110
Joined: 8/28/00
|
True, upon another rewatch
2
May 7, 2024, 10:55 PM
|
|
We had a mound visit at 1-1 after a throw into the dirt.
When play resumed the umpire indicated 2-1 (when it was really 1-1).
Then after a ball and a strike you can see the umpire indicate 3-2 (instead of 2-2).
Next pitch was a (close) ball (looked a little inside), and everyone acted like it was a walk (except a few of our infielders).
In retrospect I'd be ticked if I was the UNCC coach as the umpire signaling the wrong count and sticking with it seems like it sohuldn't put the runner in jeopardy, but I suppose those are (evidently) the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6410]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8912
Joined: 5/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1387]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 997
Joined: 12/28/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43648
Joined: 11/17/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7070
Joined: 8/3/05
|
Well, given that that pitch was a strike I was pissed that he got to bat again.
2
May 7, 2024, 9:39 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [203]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 147
Joined: 12/4/00
|
Re: Boys, can you imagine if we would have lost to the coots where we had a
2
May 7, 2024, 9:40 PM
|
|
First off…. That really looked like strike 3. Then I’m not so sure that the ump did anything but call,it a ball…and the batter just took off toward first . Glad our coaches/ players are smarter than the ump and tagged the runner out while he WALKED to second base.
After much confusion ….that was the right call
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7070
Joined: 8/3/05
|
Agree with you, the more they replayed that pitch, the more I was dumbfounded.
2
May 7, 2024, 9:44 PM
|
|
Over the knees, inside edge of the plate.
Come on ump, get some glasses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11388]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8150
Joined: 10/18/16
|
Re: Boys, can you imagine if we would have lost to the coots where we had a
1
May 7, 2024, 10:28 PM
|
|
Nice play if you can get away with it. If the runner had gotten to 2nd he would have been safe and the batter would finish his at bat. The HP Ump should/could have called the batter back but the runner on first was on his own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1920]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1639
Joined: 11/27/22
|
Re: Boys, can you imagine if we would have lost to the coots where we had a
1
May 7, 2024, 11:17 PM
|
|
Pud that was the correct call....astute by our staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1,251
|
|
|
50
