|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2876]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3394
Joined: 8/25/04
|
Difference in offensive styles.
Sep 25, 2008, 3:12 PM
|
|
This is the best educational video I could find to demonstrate the difference between the a Rob Spence style of offense and a traditional, line up and punch somebody in the mouth offense.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o2VwnBU1-iU
HaHa, just realized this was my 420 post. God I miss college.
Message was edited by: flo town tiger®
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [316]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 381
Joined: 12/6/07
|
Re: Difference in offensive styles.
Sep 25, 2008, 3:13 PM
|
|
So, we can conclude that Rob Spence's style is just offensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [682]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1009
Joined: 6/1/05
|
dude got knocked the #### out***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14533]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18193
Joined: 12/16/98
|
OUTSTANDING. Lamenting only one point to give...***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [436]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1056
Joined: 9/4/08
|
awesome***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11170]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 24737
Joined: 9/10/99
|
Seriously HOF quality***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27378]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31829
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Re: Difference in offensive styles.
Sep 25, 2008, 3:30 PM
|
|
SMASH MOUTH....exactly what we need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [436]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1056
Joined: 9/4/08
|
Rob Spence vs. Paul Johnson***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11074]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 18816
Joined: 7/24/00
|
already sold on Paul Johnson? lol***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12092]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9869
Joined: 10/29/00
|
Paul Johnson ###### excellence***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [436]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1056
Joined: 9/4/08
|
not completely sold, but you can't argue that his style
Sep 25, 2008, 3:40 PM
[ in reply to already sold on Paul Johnson? lol*** ] |
|
is smash mouth, and it has had good results so far. I doubt we'll beat them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7500]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15426
Joined: 2/2/01
|
you can't argue that his style
Sep 25, 2008, 3:45 PM
|
|
has produced a combined 36 points in 2 ACC games............I should certainly hope you're not sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [436]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1056
Joined: 9/4/08
|
nice statistical manipulation there***
Sep 25, 2008, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7500]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15426
Joined: 2/2/01
|
manipulation?-- they scored 19 points against BC, and 17
Sep 25, 2008, 4:03 PM
|
|
against VT--- those are the only 2 conf games they've played and you're enamored with his offense. I'm not saying the guy is going to fail, I'm just saying he's done nothing yet in this league to give any indication his team will be a contender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11024]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9048
Joined: 2/22/00
|
GT has trouble against good defenses******
Sep 25, 2008, 4:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12092]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9869
Joined: 10/29/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11074]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 18816
Joined: 7/24/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [749]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Not sure I would call his offense smashmouth.
Sep 25, 2008, 4:09 PM
[ in reply to not completely sold, but you can't argue that his style ] |
|
It is a great offense that allows teams with lesser talent to compete, involves a lot of misdirection and trap blocking and employs toss sweeps and multiple option looks. That is not what I'd classify as smashmouth. You say smashmouth and I think Nebraska in the 90s and before or Clemson in the 80s, not Paul Johnson. Not saying he is a bad coach, just that his offense is not smahsmouth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [5090]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7448
Joined: 4/17/08
|
I don't get it. I don't see a football anywhere in there.
Sep 25, 2008, 3:44 PM
|
|
And who plays football with no shoes on? Are you sure you linked the right video?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devotee [327]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 707
Joined: 9/2/08
|
bad freakin A$$***
Sep 25, 2008, 4:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [905]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 1862
Joined: 10/8/04
|
Nice video. Not even **remotely** like Spence's offense.
Sep 25, 2008, 4:45 PM
|
|
Spence is conservative. Runs and high percentage passes. No sweeps or options. Not many risky plays.
Not much "showiness" in the offense.
Nothing like the capoeira guy.
Good video though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2876]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3394
Joined: 8/25/04
|
You are right. But I think you missed my point.
Sep 25, 2008, 6:23 PM
|
|
I know that Spence's offense is conservative. The similarity that I saw in that video was the guys attempt at deception and confusion.
Spence has a limited number of plays that he runs. He runs them, however, from a multitude of disguising formations. The goal philosophy of his offense is to find the low-risk, high percentage plays that work, but confuse the defense with the different formations so that, hopefully, they do not know what's coming.
That fancy fighter is doing the same thing. There are only so many types of punches and kicks that a man can use. His flipping and jumping around is merely a disguise (formation) so that his opponent cannot tell what kind of punch (play) is coming.
Sadly, just like Spence, he "out-thought" himself and got knocked the #### out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
That was a great movie for those who didn't see it***
Sep 25, 2008, 5:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2876]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3394
Joined: 8/25/04
|
What movie was that from? That video was emailed to me.***
Sep 25, 2008, 6:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
