|
Replies: 26
| visibility 3,700
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43507
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
Dec 20, 2023, 3:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [670]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 389
Joined: 9/26/22
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
4
Dec 20, 2023, 4:46 PM
|
|
Outside the top 10? Is that ok? I mean it could be worse. Hopefully we can coach them up?
Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3195]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3255
Joined: 10/19/08
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
3
Dec 20, 2023, 4:58 PM
|
|
Watching College Football Live. Every national champion on the CFP era has had a 4 year average class rank of better than 10th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6964]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4343
Joined: 1/26/10
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
2
Dec 20, 2023, 5:01 PM
|
|
Well I guess we could be a first then correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3195]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3255
Joined: 10/19/08
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
4
Dec 20, 2023, 5:05 PM
|
|
Like the way you think!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15530]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21418
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
Dec 21, 2023, 8:16 AM
|
|
Me too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1344]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1172
Joined: 2/3/19
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
Dec 21, 2023, 11:04 AM
|
|
I like our class!
Quality students, quality young men, quality players, quality future graduates!
Let the problems go elsewhere. NIL and the portal targets are full of problems…..
We didn’t even have a ‘Top 10’ recruiting class when we won in 1981.
Plenty of great players, many from SC, and a lot of future pros.
The experts totally missed unranked Clemson, until we beat everybody!
The 2018 team beat the ‘Best College Football Team of All-Time’ to win the championship?
The recruiting classes are just the start. Then character and effort kick in!
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23112]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19813
Joined: 1/15/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [348]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 274
Joined: 12/23/02
|
Re: You should get your info somewhere's beside the TV
4
Dec 20, 2023, 5:25 PM
|
|
I knew that post wasn’t correct. Thanks for confirming the facts. Facts seldom get in the way of opinions around here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16507]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11655
Joined: 9/1/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6964]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4343
Joined: 1/26/10
|
Re: You should get your info somewhere's beside the TV
5
5
Dec 20, 2023, 5:51 PM
[ in reply to You should get your info somewhere's beside the TV ] |
|
This information checks out and just to take it a step further, years 2013-2016 resulted in an average recruiting rank of 13 and years 2015-2018 resulted in an average recruiting rank of 11.
At no point during our national championship runs did we have a 4 year average inside the top 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7179]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6885
Joined: 1/25/17
|
Re: You should get your info somewhere's beside the TV
2
Dec 20, 2023, 9:32 PM
|
|
This information checks out and just to take it a step further, years 2013-2016 resulted in an average recruiting rank of 13 and years 2015-2018 resulted in an average recruiting rank of 11.
At no point during our national championship runs did we have a 4 year average inside the top 10
Exactly!
People have to keep calm. IN today's CFB; it's more about "who you keep"!
What separates a 4-star and a 5-star often is "what they are asked to do for their H.S. team"! Maybe the competition they play against. Or the reputation of the program they come from.
We have seen 5-star bust as easy as a 3-star. I like how we evaluate players; we often find players who were no given the star rating they probably deserved. In short, we will be fine with this recruiting class. I am excited about it personally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6982]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6355
Joined: 9/21/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16263]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12789
Joined: 11/14/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55433]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58433
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
2
Dec 20, 2023, 6:36 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings ] |
|
Most of the recruiting classes under Dabo have been from top 10-15 with a few that was in single digits, but I don't think there was that many!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38124]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9360
Joined: 6/13/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [117]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 124
Joined: 12/7/22
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
Dec 21, 2023, 2:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings ] |
|
the difference between Georgia's class and Ours isn't that significant. Without looking I'm sure they have more commits which inflates the ranking.
Happens every year. In Swinney's mind we have the #1 class.
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12547]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12248
Joined: 11/21/11
|
I'm seeing Clemson at #10 on Rivals.
2
Dec 20, 2023, 5:04 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [293]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 242
Joined: 10/31/03
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
2
Dec 20, 2023, 6:10 PM
|
|
Will Dabo start to take the portal more seriously or are we the fans expected to stay demoted to a second tier team? Just asking. ..Would love to hear some comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 917
Joined: 10/18/11
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
1
Dec 20, 2023, 6:50 PM
|
|
Pockets are not as deep as some. It’s a different era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [236]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 254
Joined: 10/3/05
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
3
Dec 20, 2023, 7:11 PM
|
|
So Dabo’s next national championship will be a bigger accomplishment than either of the first two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [364]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 928
Joined: 11/18/23
|
We have nil money, but we dont throw it around to the dudes
2
Dec 20, 2023, 11:01 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings ] |
|
that walk in the door with their hand out.
The NIL as structured now will not work. It’s not sustainable and people are going to slow down throwing money at guys who take it and run, like Juice Wells at USuC.
At some point there will be more constraining guardrails, say like a “salary cap” for instance. No problem taking the high road as all this settles down.
We are still bringing just as talented players as usual. We just need the QB the be much better and great. That’s the recipe. We have the system, but Cade was going thru his 2nd OC in two years and is on a more typical development curve.
With the players we have and the influx of players we have coming in, where some guys will ultimately stand out, as Cade improves we will see great dividends.
We wouldn’t have won any national championships without great QB play. That’s pretty much the case for every CFP national champion. Even Stetson Bennet played at an elite level. But remember, he was first demoted to 2nd behind JT Daniels. Stetson improved, played great, and led the team to the two nattys.
Let’s go Cade!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12879]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8198
Joined: 3/30/16
|
Re: We have nil money, but we dont throw it around to the dudes
Dec 21, 2023, 9:33 AM
|
|
Well said PT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2638]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 2707
Joined: 5/28/02
|
Excellent! So now rivals is the standard
1
Dec 20, 2023, 8:24 PM
|
|
247 has Clemson 4th in the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12879]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8198
Joined: 3/30/16
|
Re: Excellent! So now rivals is the standard
Dec 21, 2023, 9:35 AM
|
|
One poll has Miami above FSU.
I think we have as good a chance to win the conference as anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [364]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 928
Joined: 11/18/23
|
Were doomed!
Dec 20, 2023, 9:39 PM
|
|
lol 🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1924]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2144
Joined: 8/21/01
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's updated 2024 team recruiting rankings
Dec 23, 2023, 8:33 PM
|
|
10 3 star recruits and no portal players doesn't exactly win championships
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 3,700
|
|
|
50
