|
Replies: 27
| visibility 1
|
Legend [17794]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13392
Joined: 9/16/03
|
Would this not make sense?
Dec 2, 2016, 9:47 AM
|
|
If Bama, Clemson, WASH win this weekend,
1. Alabama***
2. Clemson***
3. Washington***
4. Ohio State (or a 2 loss Penn State)
***- Conference Champ
Ohio State or Penn State should be the 4th ranked team- Ohio State not being the Conference Champ, or Penn State being a 2 loss conference champ.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [64709]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89041
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Agreed !***
Dec 2, 2016, 9:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2351]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2725
Joined: 9/12/04
|
I like it
Dec 2, 2016, 9:53 AM
|
|
Not sure they'd do it, but they should.
They really really really want an OSU/Bama matchup in the finals tho.
But maybe just maybe someone will remind them of last year's final game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17794]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13392
Joined: 9/16/03
|
i was thinking that too, but they have a guaranteed matchup
Dec 2, 2016, 9:57 AM
|
|
if they play in round 1. They had terrible ratings last year, wouldnt that fix it ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2351]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2725
Joined: 9/12/04
|
I think it would be ideal
Dec 2, 2016, 11:26 AM
|
|
They get the guaranteed Bama/OSU matchup and one of the two in the finals. The chance of Clemson in that game against either would be a huge draw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1676]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2113
Joined: 8/27/11
|
Re: I like it
Dec 2, 2016, 9:59 AM
[ in reply to I like it ] |
|
Espn may want that, but keep seeing people say that, like the committee has a secret agenda. U do remember who is on the committee?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: I like it
Dec 2, 2016, 10:09 AM
|
|
Dan gets recused.....however, Bobby still is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1246]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1222
Joined: 9/10/15
|
makes perfect sense
Dec 2, 2016, 9:57 AM
|
|
And I think this is what we will see from the committee if we win the ACC and Washington wins PAC-12. If we both win, it will be interesting to see how the committee values head-to-head and conference championship vs eye test
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: Would this not make sense?
Dec 2, 2016, 9:57 AM
|
|
It does, but I wouldn't expect it.
If all happens like that, will likely be:
1. Alabama***
2. Clemson***
3. Ohio State (bigger resume in regards to Washington/win over Penn State) <--this is where that talk about overall resume trumping conference Championship may come into play
4. Washington*** (or a 2 loss Penn State)
***- Conference Champ
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: Would this not make sense?
Dec 2, 2016, 9:58 AM
|
|
sorry...OH State (loss to Penn State)...mucked that up
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11860]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8584
Joined: 2/2/16
|
But who was Wisconsin?***
Dec 2, 2016, 10:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [39020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51623
Joined: 11/20/04
|
They're hoping for a Wisconsin win
Dec 2, 2016, 1:52 PM
|
|
because it'll be easy to justify Ohio State then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
should be another SEC team...
Dec 2, 2016, 10:04 AM
|
|
So my Coot in laws can have two more chances to beat us this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4423]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3407
Joined: 10/15/03
|
to me, this would....
Dec 2, 2016, 10:04 AM
|
|
1) Alabama vs. 8) Western Michigan (highest ranked non Power 5 team)
2) Clemson vs. 7) Michigan
3) Washington v. 6) Ohio State (at large)
4) Penn St. vs. 5) Oklahoma (assuming they are B12 champ)
**top 5 spots automatically go to the conference champs
**spots 6 and 7 are the 2 highest ranked non-conference champions
**spot 8 goes to the highest ranked non power 5 team
problem solved!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 581
Joined: 1/25/12
|
Re: to me, this would....
Dec 2, 2016, 10:12 AM
|
|
You got it right!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8094]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6826
Joined: 10/16/09
|
Re: to me, this would....
Dec 2, 2016, 10:13 AM
[ in reply to to me, this would.... ] |
|
Only problem with that is if you expand to 8 teams the conference championship games go bye bye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4423]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3407
Joined: 10/15/03
|
thats fine. reg season champs is enough
Dec 2, 2016, 10:47 AM
|
|
or play 1 less reg season game. 8 or 9 conference games and 2 or 3 OOC games. and only allow 1 against a non-power 5 team
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [39020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51623
Joined: 11/20/04
|
Don't like it.
Dec 2, 2016, 1:53 PM
[ in reply to to me, this would.... ] |
|
Giving the top five seeds to conference champs means we have a tougher game than Penn State in the first round. Conference champs (P5) should get automatic *berths*, but the seed should be based on ranking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1654]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 3509
Joined: 11/18/01
|
why do y'all think conf championship has a thing to do with
Dec 2, 2016, 10:10 AM
|
|
Seed? It has never been said that it does only that it can help you get in. A one loss OSU that does not make theIr conf championship does not Necessarily make them a worse team than a Washington team that wins their conference. It only helps you get in.
FYI I do not Like OSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17794]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13392
Joined: 9/16/03
|
Its about resumes. BAMA/CLEM/WASH would have a Conf Champ
Dec 2, 2016, 11:24 AM
|
|
on their resume . Ohio State doesn't. No problem letting them in, but not above any conference champion with the same or better record. If Penn State gets in over OSU, fine, but they would have 2 losses = #4 spot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17075
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Would this not make sense?
Dec 2, 2016, 10:13 AM
|
|
I don't understand why you guys are so worried about Ohio State. They don't appear like they can beat you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4423]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3407
Joined: 10/15/03
|
in what part of this post or any in this thread said anythin
Dec 2, 2016, 10:36 AM
|
|
anything about being worried about ohio state? he's simply making a statement for where he thinks the teams SHOULD be ranked.
i, personally, would much rather face OSU than Washington. The main reason.. 1 word.. SPEED. I dont think ohio state can match up with our speed. I think washington can. Also, i dont konw as much about washington. they are a bit of an unknown for us
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28650]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14128
Joined: 6/27/14
|
nobody worried
Dec 2, 2016, 11:12 AM
[ in reply to Re: Would this not make sense? ] |
|
its about reality. they are sitting home and there must be a price paid for that. believe me, i would love to play them. they are not a threat
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17794]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13392
Joined: 9/16/03
|
Not concerned with who we play. im just looking at this
Dec 2, 2016, 11:16 AM
[ in reply to Re: Would this not make sense? ] |
|
through a CFB fan's perspective- and Ohio State happens to be the wild card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64709]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89041
Joined: 3/27/01
|
LOL...bless your heart !!!!
Dec 2, 2016, 12:55 PM
[ in reply to Re: Would this not make sense? ] |
|
I see that reading comprehension is still a struggle for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [39020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51623
Joined: 11/20/04
|
Not worried, just don't think they deserve to be there.
Dec 2, 2016, 1:54 PM
[ in reply to Re: Would this not make sense? ] |
|
Conference championships should mean something, IMO. Otherwise why did PSU even play OSU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7010]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9418
Joined: 9/9/03
|
There is no sense in Murica.....
Dec 2, 2016, 10:33 AM
|
|
OVER/UNDER (in hours) on how long the Playoff Berth Announcement is delayed Sunday....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16207]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13076
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Perfect...
Dec 2, 2016, 1:57 PM
|
|
...sense. Something is really wrong about Ohio Stat basically getting a bye week this weekend. And they earned their "bye week" by losing to Penn State. Absolutely crazy how this works out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 27
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
