When a vaccinated Fauci walked into a vaccinated

Honest to god, it couldn't have gone worse.

Back on May 13 the CDC advised everyone that if you were vaccinated you didn't need to wear masks indoors. Not only that, but the proposition was that if you get the vaccine, your life can be normal again! No more masks, no more social distancing, it's time to party!!!

Whether or not you agree with the effectiveness of masks, one thing for certain is that vaccinated people not only took their masks off, but they then let their guard down all the way, having been given the false impression that a vaccine guaranteed them sufficient immunity such that there was no way they could transmit the virus. That turned out to be a wildly incorrect assumption.

The present situation with all these breakthrough cases reinforces the argument that calling these treatments "vaccines" is well-intentioned but probably overstated.

The CDC was overly optimistic after the spring based on the transmission data. They knew from the get-go that vaccinated people could still transit the virus and the lurking potential danger of variants.

But that messaging was in conflict with the governments rosy assessments and promotion of a return to normalcy through vaccination. They conflated the word "vaccine" to imply that these marvels of modern medicine cure us of all of our pandemic problems. We could finally go back to the office, go back to school, have big weddings, bar mitzvahs, etc.

Now, after having sold everyone on "the cure", they've unintentionally created a credibility problem thanks to all the breakthrough cases amongst the vaccinated. Apparently virus variants don't give a #### about semantics.

The public relations message fail is only going to make vaccination harder going forward, so you have to wonder if maybe they could have managed expectations and called these shots something more mundane.... like
"derisking agents", lol.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02187-1

How do vaccinated people spread Delta? What the science says

Emerging data suggest that Delta could spread more readily than other coronavirus variants among people vaccinated against COVID-19. But key questions remain.

Tiggity®

Oculus Spirit [97903]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 64995

Joined: 7/13/02

He wore two masks because he knew he could spread it just as

Aug 25, 2021, 9:16 AM

easy as anyone else. And he then had to figure out a way to say he was wrong, he knew he was wrong, he lied, you should wear two masks, and vaccines do little to stop transmission. But he can't say that, so I can't even remember what he said that time, but it was bad I'm sure. And he's already hedging again now.

They started when they said delta was like a new virus. Another phase, whatever he said. Now he's hinting that some day a variant will come that beats the vaccine. It's already here, and they know it. Not a variant that beats our vaccine, but beats VACCINES, period.

That's going to come in time. Delta has mutated at least 25 times since it began in India. No variant has mutated that much. It's also mutating in areas we know little about, not in the spike protein but in areas controlling immune suppression. The one thing we need to beat a virus, ANY virus, is for our immune system to work. Without it working, vaccines, prior antibodies, none of that will stop it from spreading. And now Fauci is recommending monoclonal antibodies, EARLY, when you're barely sick. Why? Because that's when you carry the most virus. Attack it then while your immune system is down, and it's easier to recover (no hospital). Delta brought a massive increase in the already bad initial immune suppression seen in covid, it's worse, more extreme, and lasts longer. It also brought about a greater ability to replicate, early, uncontrolled, while your interferons are suppressed. Only after it has reached maximum infectiousness, maximum shedding, and maximum levels of transmissibility, do you start to feel sick (vaccine or not). By that time the virus has already done what it needs to do. Vaccine or not. Vaccines can't help until your interferons kick in and let your immune system know you're infected. So it's game over for vaccines stopping the spread. Not happening. Same goes for prior immunity, again vaccine antibodies or natural ones, doesn't matter if you don't know to use them for days. They still help you clear the virus far faster, and that keeps you out of the hospital and alive, so they still have a very good use. HOWEVER, that was not how the vaccines were sold. That's not how prior immunity was sold. That's why there is no herd immunity happening.

So knowing it works this way, you sit back and watch Fauci squirm, and you know he knows all this, but has to keep this information hidden, and tactfully change his misguidance. And most people, Fauci knows, don't know what's in the paragraph above, and they don't want to EXPLAIN it, they just want to govern. One thing I've learned in my job is people who know nothing recoil at being informed by an "expert", especially if that expert doesn't explain things to them, so they can learn WHY something is said, or certain advice is given, ESPECIALLY advice or information they don't like, want to hear, or agree with. People generally aren't idiots, they're capable of learning basic things. People are often ignorant though, until informed. Effective leadership and governance would favor someone like Fauci explaining the X's and O's, and then when the CDC executes the game plan everyone knows why. Fauci should have explained what is in the paragraph above, THEN go into talking about the vaccines and policy. Maybe bring some charts like Ross Perot, I dunno. That doesn't happen though. He doesn't want to inform or educate. That's bad news. No one wants to hear it anyway, so he just goes out there and makes comments, suggestions, etc. without explaining anything, so no one believes him, and then the politicians can make hay, and more people end up dead.

And you can go further. This initial immune suppression was less pronounced in children, who generally carry more interferons as they have a more sensitive immune system than adults. Older you get, less interferons, more diabetes, less interferons, elderly, less interferons, so that's the reason for the age difference in infections. Delta has expanded its reach to younger, and healthier people by increasing initial immune suppression further. But again this explains things, and no one wants to hear that. When someone says kids need masks more than ever now, children are getting sick at much higher rates, and hospitalizations in children are climbing, it's much easier to hang onto old data, and say they're in no more danger than they were. That's what people want to hear. That's not the truth though. My own school district, back in January of 2020, at the height of the pandemic (previously), had around 140 students infected with covid at their peak. And that was with masks, social distancing, etc. and a different virus. Today they have 300 students positive after a week and a half of school. School started with 111 students sick. There were 300 students initially quarantined. Now there are 1,850. And this is all known, again as EXPLAINED above. And then when it happens, and people have been given no explanation WHY, they don't believe it. Some of those 300 kids are in hospitals right now. Some of them brought the virus home, infected parents, who will end up in a hospital.

Even "experts"...experts become experts because they never stop learning. They know things change, and they change by studying changes, hence keeping their "expert" status. Anyway, even experts are changing their studies. They're now looking into, and studying other parts of the virus genome they had largely ignored previously. They know this is where change is happening, not where they initially looked, and they know the whole game plan has changed. Mutations are happening now in the ORF sections of the genome dictating viral replication and immune suppression, and not as much in the S gene, that controls transmission. Evolution in the virus, as it was exposed to our vaccines targeting the spike protein, has shifted from S gene mutations to latch on better to human cells, to increasing immune suppression as the virus has learned that is how to circumvent our vaccines and continue spreading. It's just what's happening. If there is any good news, it's that the virus is likely not any more severe for those with vaccines, or antibodies from a prior infection. It IS more severe though for those unvaccinated and especially those unvaccinated with no prior immunity from infection. And this is the reason for the big vaccine push now. They know this, but haven't explained it to you, and you don't trust them, and why should you?

And Fauci is not honest, or candid, and as such, no one believes him, and rightfully so. Same with the CDC. Same with everything. It's like your parent telling you to do something you don't want to do "because they say so" versus the parent telling you to do something you don't want to do BECAUSE if you don't do it, this will happen, or this won't happen, and then when they understand the consequences they're more likely to do it. Kids universally recoil at the first approach. So do adults.

There's no agenda in the information presented. But I think what we may end up seeing, long term, MAY be something like Brazil saw. You may notice delta spiked then dropped in India, as it has in many places. The way the virus is mutating though, means it could end up sustained at very high levels for a long time, like Brazil saw. Early indications from England and South Africa seem to show this. Cases peaked, dropped maybe 1/4, and then level off as the virus keeps going around. It is slowly rising again in South Africa and England right now. More reason for getting the vaccine.