Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 7
| visibility 901

UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 8:55 PM
Reply

What was up with that? Setting aside the fact that it appeared Maye would've walked in if he gets the snap off on time, even if they get into the EZ, they cut the lead to 9 - still 2 scores. Not only that, they waste a Time Out with the clock stopped. In a 2 score game, very significant. Just take the Delay Of Game and kick the XTRA PT. Even still, after burning the TO, they still decide to go for 2. FANTASTIC defensive play by Mukumba btw

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Best Is The Standard


Re: UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 8:58 PM
Reply

That made no sense at all. Thought TNetters called the play

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Who put the "L" in BrowneLL


Re: UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 9:02 PM
Reply

Simple, math is not Mack’s friend…

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 9:01 PM
Reply

They had a bunch of old guys looking at a book so I’m guessing it was the analytics in going for it. They all looked at each other and nodded.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They wanted to eventually win in regulation, not tie.

1

Nov 18, 2023, 9:03 PM
Reply

8-8-3

Not getting it means they would need to go for two to tie. But they were already planning on going for two if they got another TD.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Anybody that says Coach Brownell is the best coach to come through Clemson is going to start an argument." -JP Hall


Re: UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 9:14 PM
Reply

We can all agree If they take the extra point like most coaches would, they can tie the game with a TD and a field goal and take it to OT. Brown apparently decided he wanted to avoid OT if possible.

With or without the extra point, he can still win with 2 more TDs.

If he gets the 2, they're down by 9 and he can play for a win with a TD and field goal.

If he doesn't get 2, they're down by 11 and he still has an opportunity to play for OT with a TD, 2 point conversion, and field goal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 9:21 PM
Reply

Yeah, but wasting a timeout was the bigger issue.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UNC's decision to Go For 2 down by 11 points with 07:00 to go


Nov 18, 2023, 9:26 PM
Reply

I think the thought there is if you cut it to 9, you can win with a field goal if you score another td. If you don’t get the two points, it’s still a 2 score game regardless.

It worked out for us either way but I believe that was their thought process

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 7
| visibility 901
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic