Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
UMichigan cancels screening of American Sniper
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 25
| visibility 1

UMichigan cancels screening of American Sniper


Apr 8, 2015, 5:29 PM

http://www.michigandaily.com/news/umix-film-removed

Lulz:

"“Student reactions have clearly articulated that this is neither the venue nor the time to show this movie,” the statement read. “We deeply regret causing harm to members of our community, and appreciate the thoughtful feedback provided to us by students.”

...

“As a student who identifies as an Arab and Middle Eastern student, I feel that ‘American Sniper’ condones a lot of anti-Middle Eastern and North African propaganda,” Mekkaoui said.

She added that she felt the film was released at a time when negative attitudes toward Middle Eastern and Northern African groups were at a peak.

“It was released at a time when these anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-Middle Eastern (and) North African hate crimes were already skyrocketing and this movie only contributed to that,” he said.

...

“Although we respect the right to freedom of speech, we believe that with this right comes responsibility: responsibility of action, intention, and outcome,” the letter read. “The movie ‘American Sniper’ not only tolerates but promotes anti-Muslim and anti-MENA rhetoric and sympathizes with a mass killer.

...

“We in the Center for Campus Involvement and the UMix Late Night program did not intend to exclude any students or communities on campus through showing this film,” they wrote. “Nevertheless, as we know, intent and impact can be very different things.”

Mekkaoui said she appreciated CCI’s quick response to student concerns.

“I just want to say thank you to the Center for Campus Involvement for listening to student feedback, and for taking quick action to make sure (that) once they found that they had done something that made students on campus feel uncomfortable, they took immediate action to change that,” she said."

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UMichigan cancels screening of American Sniper


Apr 8, 2015, 5:37 PM

Your point about political correctness in academia the other day is well-taken.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Summa cum laude. Magna cum laude. The radio’s too loudy.


One really special comment on the article...


Apr 8, 2015, 5:38 PM

"I'm glad the University of Michigan has finally decided to make a statement that they actually care about the safety of marginalized students on campus. The movie was medieval and glamorizes American military operations. Chris Kyle is a self-proclaimed racist and islamaphobe (look up any of his statements and if you don't see it, I don't know what to tell you), depicting his "journey" in the midst of war and romanticizing his experience, while only regarding his perspective on the injuries mental, physical and emotional undergone during war. This movie reinforces that Americans care more about American lives than those of the millions of others dying at the hands (or should i say gun) of our military. No one needs to see another war movie that uses the same washed out, nationalistic "freedom fighting" rhetoric that people use to... circulate their personal prejudices. Especially not students priding themselves on being the "best and the brightest" of leaders, we who are supposed to be ushering in a new era of social impact."



God forfend that Americans make movies that "glamorize American military operations."

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Your topic is a little misleading


Apr 8, 2015, 5:46 PM

It seems like some sort of club at Michigan that puts on late night movies made this decision, and not the University of Michigan as a whole. It's not like the president of the canceled the movie.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's a series hosted by their center for campus involvement


Apr 8, 2015, 6:06 PM

Not just a club on their campus. The people showing the movie are staff of the university.


Message was edited by: camcgee®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Still


Apr 8, 2015, 6:09 PM

This seems like an extremely small portion of the University of Michigan and not the University as an entirety. It sounds like a few faculty members who show movies.

Would you think "Clemson University Starts Petition to Change the Name of Tillman Hall" misleading? I member of the Clemson staff started that petition, but maybe he doesn't speak for the entire university?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If the Hendrix Center cancelled a screeing of "Sniper"...


Apr 8, 2015, 6:17 PM

would it make sense to say "Hendrix Center cancels screening..." or would that needlessly obscure things? Anyway, the point was that staff at UM responsible for screening movies made the choice not to screen "Sniper" because of the complaints described.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Does anyone mention the lives that were saved because of the


Apr 8, 2015, 5:51 PM

US even being over there? If not for the intervention of the US and other countries their Moms, Dads, brothers, sisters, etc. might have been killed/murdered by radicals (religious or other).

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Their twitter responds:


Apr 8, 2015, 5:52 PM

Campus Involvement
?@UMInvolvement

We're planning to show American Sniper in a separate forum that provides an appropriate space for dialogue & reflection. More info to come.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

this is almost worse than not showing it


Apr 8, 2015, 6:02 PM

It's like saying that there's something especially offensive about "American Sniper" that makes it unfit to show without some sort of disclaimer. I thought college was precisely the kind of "space" that was appropriate for dialogue and reflection...

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't get it


Apr 8, 2015, 6:06 PM

Regardless if you agree or disagree with the criticism of American Sniper, you can admit that there is criticism. I don't see an issue with showing it at a venue more conducive to both sides being able to discuss their views.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do you need that at every movie?


Apr 8, 2015, 6:15 PM

Or just the movies that certain groups find problematic? The problem is that doing this kind of thing allows people to control what others see and how they see it. Whereas, before, 'Sniper' was going to be shown in a theater setting just like any other movie, now there has to be a special accommodation for it, as if there was something especially wrong with it. And that's not even touching on the specific complaints that were in the petition (like referring to Kyle as a "mass killer," and justifying not showing it because it might make some students "uncomfortable").

Movies, if they're any good, frequently arouse discussion. Unless universities intend to protect their students from every controversial movie by only showing them in "safe spaces," making this kind of accommodation is a very bad idea. I mean, heck, the only stuff they could show in a regular setting would be PG rated movies.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We've discussed American Sniper ad nauseum in here


Apr 8, 2015, 6:25 PM

as it was a controversial film. Moving it to a venue that addresses those controversies isn't that big a problem.

I'd agree that NOT showing the movie at all is a problem, but changing of venue to better address a movie's obvious controversies isn't that...controversial.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

that is worse. most just want.to go to


Apr 8, 2015, 6:44 PM

The movie and have fun. Now its turning political. This is the same where conservative speakers are booked and a small group of students throw temper tantrums and get it canceled. Free ideas are only for one side at most colleges.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Eh. it's the opposite of your example...


Apr 8, 2015, 7:00 PM

as now there will be a discussion about the movie which is actually engaging the subject matter instead of in your example which is disengaging. That's a pretty important distinction.

But I understand the concern you and cam have here. I just think you guys are exaggerating the concern here.

I see it as a College taking the concerns of some of their students surrounding a known controversial film and engaging in a discussion about those controversies. It's not necessarily giving in or destroying free speech as you guys are arguing. Now, if they decide to cancel the discussion too, then there's a definite issue.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No


Apr 8, 2015, 11:57 PM

A closer analogy to this situation is when liberal (really, we should say "leftist") students have tried to prevent people from speaking that they disagree with, and when they can't keep them from coming to campus they end up getting the administration to approve alternative commencements so that students can have a "safe space" where they don't have to feel uncomfortable hearing different ideas.

There was nothing preventing anybody from talking about whatever controversies they wanted to talk about with "Sniper" (although the ones cited by the students at UM are particularly ridiculous). But the staff caved to the demands of people who claimed that "Sniper" shouldn't be shown because it made them "uncomfortable," and now the only way the film can be shown is with an asterisk in a "safe space."

This is the event where "Sniper" was going to be shown: http://campusinvolvement.umich.edu/article/umix-late-night-returns. Was it really inappropriate to show it in that venue? Was it really necessary to basically apply an asterisk to the showing, which now won't be part of "UMix?"


*** And here's UMix's updated statement, which is closer to what the original reaction should've been, but is still pretty laughable (they're showing an alternative at another location, and it's... Paddington- which was apparently what they were going to replace 'Sniper' with in the first place): http://publicaffairs.vpcomm.umich.edu/statement-regarding-american-sniper-movie/


Message was edited by: camcgee®


Message was edited by: camcgee®

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

hope their updated statement settle people down


Apr 9, 2015, 12:32 AM

probably not.

Not sure what's worse, getting upset over a movie or getting upset at people who get upset over a movie. Such a stupid issue to get upset about on both sides.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The problem is censorship on college campuses


Apr 9, 2015, 12:59 AM

It's not just about this particular movie being cancelled. Lots of ink has been spilled lately about a trendy kind of campus censorship in which (usually leftist) students claim that things they disagree with make them feel "unsafe" or "uncomfortable," and thus demand that they be protected from being exposed to those things. This is just the latest example, but it also strikes a chord with folks who object to the characterization of American war heroes as "mass killers."

I agree that no particular instance of this kind of stuff is important or relevant to our lives, but the academy is usually the avante garde of the general culture. If we're shielding college students from everything that makes them uncomfortable while also promoting the idea that censoring things that makes us uncomfortable is advancing social justice, how long will it be until that kind of thing breaks out into the culture at large? Won't that kind of censorship also detract from higher education?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Honestly, that's ridiculous


Apr 8, 2015, 11:50 PM [ in reply to We've discussed American Sniper ad nauseum in here ]

Lots of movies are controversial. Does that mean none of those movies can be shown outside of a "safe space?" Are we really prepared to say that students need to be protected from a movie that makes them uncomfortable because they don't portray American soldiers in Iraq negatively?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No, because I'm not saying any of that.


Apr 9, 2015, 12:21 AM

I'm not arguing that they have to show the movie with discussion, but I do think that's a valid consideration for a movie like Sniper. It's up to the school/club to weigh whether they want to take the critique of students seriously.

If the school didn't decide to show the movie at all as originally reported then I'd find that ridiculous. But, expanding the dialogue around the movie, especially on a college campus, doesn't sound ridiculous to me. To me, that's the opposite of "protecting students from a movie that makes them uncomfortable." But that's just me looking at it from a non-reactionary viewpoint.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

People like Mekkaoui should be laughed at and ridiculed


Apr 8, 2015, 5:56 PM

Instead, we bow to their demands.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

kids having reality dysfunction***


Apr 8, 2015, 5:57 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Apparently now they're going to show it in a "safe space"


Apr 8, 2015, 5:57 PM

I wonder if they'll have to show every movie anybody complains about in a "separate forum that provides an appropriate space for dialogue and reflection," or just the ones that are subject to the hecklers veto from favored groups.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I hope it has play-doh and coloring books


Apr 8, 2015, 6:00 PM

It's sad and telling that it wouldn't shock anyone if it actually did.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-lakebum1-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Good for her.


Apr 8, 2015, 7:09 PM

Now everybody will buy the video, bich.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

After this and many other bs I have read


Apr 9, 2015, 12:36 AM

I'm pretty sure in 30 years the lunge can rule America with an "Iron Fist" of insults. Imagine people running and crying, cowering in fear from a simple "you suck"? Our every word just terrifying the masses we will be unstoppable. Why they wont even look at us for fear of the insults we can rain down upon them. Bide your time oh kings of calamity for soon our day of reckoning will BEGIN!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 25
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic