|
Replies: 15
| visibility 550
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43515
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
1
Jan 19, 2024, 12:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [12881]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/30/16
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 19, 2024, 12:03 PM
|
|
WTH was the score?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [800]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7
Joined: 1/3/04
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 19, 2024, 1:53 PM
|
|
81-64. First sentence of article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4059]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4548
Joined: 3/6/01
|
You say they lost, but what was the score?***
Jan 19, 2024, 12:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [915]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1721
Joined: 12/26/07
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 19, 2024, 12:05 PM
|
|
#### poor article. No score. Must have been written by a student.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [261]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 295
Joined: 8/18/03
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
2
Jan 19, 2024, 12:49 PM
|
|
This team and program has regressed. Showed promise early on in Butler’s tenure but is sliding down while other ACC programs are getting better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [986]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 1959
Joined: 12/28/14
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
1
Jan 19, 2024, 1:45 PM
|
|
poor recruiting lack of talent hard to watch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3995]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2471
Joined: 10/10/08
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
1
Jan 19, 2024, 1:51 PM
|
|
Butler was a bad hire by DRad. You could see from what she did at Florida that she wasn't very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10927]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12727
Joined: 9/28/10
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
2
Jan 19, 2024, 2:21 PM
|
|
Way too early to tell. We give basketball coaches at Clemson 14 seasons. She should get the same treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10927]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12727
Joined: 9/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3995]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2471
Joined: 10/10/08
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 19, 2024, 2:34 PM
|
|
That is a decent accomplishment but never made it past 2nd round. They fired her btw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3995]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2471
Joined: 10/10/08
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 19, 2024, 2:38 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards ] |
|
Only had an overall .580 winning percentage and losing record in the SEC. She wasn't bad but she wasn't great either. I still say she was a bad hire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25014]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32323
Joined: 2/15/09
|
Next two games against ranked VT and NC State
1
Jan 19, 2024, 2:11 PM
|
|
it's looking like it will be 1-7 in the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48407]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14955
Joined: 11/7/20
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 19, 2024, 4:12 PM
|
|
Very misleading post on Twitter. "Hard fought battle. Louisville up 47-32 at the half and extended it to 25 point lead after 3. Then Louisville emptied the bench in q4 and we won that quarter. We didn't give up. That's one thing I can say about our girls, they don't give up.
We've actually recruited fairly well. Much better than our record indicates. Ott is in her 3rd year. She was supposed to our leading rebound and 3pt shooter.
We turn it over a lot but we have no height
And get crushed on the offense rebounds. Even on foul shots. Idk. I'd give her one more year with the top 10 national recruit coming in. But it would have to be ncaa deep run or that's it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25014]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32323
Joined: 2/15/09
|
the "we never quite" thing
Jan 19, 2024, 4:58 PM
|
|
always annoys me, in any sport. Because usually once you dig a huge hole, all the pressure is off and the team with the big lead naturally lets their foot off of the gas a bit.
So I think coaches are always a bit too too positive when they try to say its a great sign that they were able to cut the gap some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [236]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 425
Joined: 10/19/15
|
Re: TNET: Tigers fall to No. 13 Cards
Jan 20, 2024, 4:01 PM
|
|
LADY Tigers lose….identify the team you’re talking about!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 550
|
|
|
50
