|
Replies: 16
| visibility 651
|
110%er [5456]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5197
Joined: 12/3/07
|
Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
3
Jan 1, 2024, 11:11 PM
|
|
Dude is a baller.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [7730]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 893
Joined: 6/12/14
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:12 PM
|
|
ACC Champs...Playoff & he wins the Heisman this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22508]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7182
Joined: 8/31/03
|
Extremely.
2
Jan 1, 2024, 11:13 PM
|
|
Kid can spin the rock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22508]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7182
Joined: 8/31/03
|
BTW, he's a portal guy.
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:14 PM
|
|
Came from Indiana, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4085]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2948
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:13 PM
|
|
We would definitely be better. But Washington has a much better OL and better wide receivers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3928]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4709
Joined: 9/2/03
|
I think this is the best answer so far.***
Jan 1, 2024, 11:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14027]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7884
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
2
Jan 1, 2024, 11:13 PM
|
|
eh... still have to block for him and that catching thing is a bother as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11221
Joined: 9/23/07
|
He wouldn't be a good fit for the "Clemson offense"
Jan 1, 2024, 11:14 PM
|
|
because he doesn't run the ball, basically at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18799]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12828
Joined: 11/30/95
|
He would be a good fit.
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:52 PM
|
|
You are insane to think not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3615]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 8864
Joined: 5/16/22
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:16 PM
|
|
A little better, but this year. Amazingly better next year with better WRs and an improved OL. This year we would be better, but he would look nothing like he does now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1157]
TigerPulse: 87%
Posts: 693
Joined: 1/6/23
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
Jan 1, 2024, 11:22 PM
|
|
He throws too many 50/50 balls to elite wide receivers we don't have but may get soon so tough call. I think he wins us one or two more games because of his experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3928]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4709
Joined: 9/2/03
|
Our two best QB's threw a ton of 50/50 balls.***
Jan 1, 2024, 11:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9672]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11422
Joined: 9/10/99
|
He meant that we dont have the WRs to catch them
Jan 1, 2024, 11:54 PM
|
|
I think…
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30467]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 47460
Joined: 12/20/99
|
Well, how much better is Washingtons Oline and receiving core?
Jan 1, 2024, 11:35 PM
|
|
🐅
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7020]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12744
Joined: 11/21/99
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
Jan 1, 2024, 11:41 PM
|
|
better but we need more than improved qb play
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1584]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/26/10
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
Jan 1, 2024, 11:51 PM
|
|
Dude is also 23 years old.
Let’s see how good Cade is at 23. . .if he’s still playing cfb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4789]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7499
Joined: 10/24/00
|
Re: Theoretically, how good would Clemson be if we had Penix?
Jan 2, 2024, 12:06 AM
|
|
Then we would be Coots. Oops. Sorry. You said penix, I thought you said something else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 651
|
|
|
50
