|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [108390]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
no.
Dec 9, 2015, 3:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [97078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29240
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Plyer breaks the plane?
Dec 9, 2015, 3:10 PM
|
|
Did he mean "Plyler"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108390]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
maybe and if he did
Dec 9, 2015, 3:13 PM
|
|
he's going have to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [141033]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33942
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Never thought I'd get to pull this thing out again...***
Dec 9, 2015, 3:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1497]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1249
Joined: 8/31/08
|
That's what she said.***
Dec 9, 2015, 4:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89031
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Wouldn't that be an illegal formation rather than offsides***
Dec 9, 2015, 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1055]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 731
Joined: 10/13/03
|
There are a number of rules that roll up into one penalty...
Dec 9, 2015, 3:21 PM
|
|
See page FR-64 and FR-112 in the official NCAA Football Rules. The actual penalty would be 'Infraction of free kick formation' but I doubt you will ever hear that. The signal is offsides... see page FR-134 (signals 18-19)
http://www.ncfafootball.com/resources/Rules/FR15.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [640]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 246
Joined: 12/13/10
|
Why on earth are we still discussing this on the bored???
Dec 9, 2015, 3:20 PM
|
|
We have OU game ahead, undefeated and ranked #1. If that is not enough, the coots year and coaching hire should just make us smile. Life as a Tiger is so great, we should just be enjoying it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4563]
TigerPulse: 63%
Posts: 4404
Joined: 10/13/13
|
one would think the call went against the Tigers
Dec 9, 2015, 3:21 PM
|
|
with all the threads on it
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
People spend a lot of time these days worrying about
Dec 9, 2015, 3:32 PM
|
|
someone having a different opinion.
A thread 5-10 years ago may have been "The refs made a terrible call against us." Now it's a bunch of "SO-AND-SO said this thing I really disagree with! What an idiot!" So many threads every day like that. I don't get it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Unless our ACC Championship has been taken away
Dec 9, 2015, 3:28 PM
|
|
then IDGAF
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26332]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14241
Joined: 2/5/08
|
^^^The spirit and answer I was looking for.***
Dec 9, 2015, 3:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: The rule as to why the offsides call was correct...
Dec 9, 2015, 3:31 PM
|
|
Not shocked this post came from you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10360]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14030
Joined: 11/9/04
|
the breaking of the plane can be debated........
Dec 9, 2015, 4:05 PM
|
|
which is what the ref called for, but regardless of whether anybody agrees with the ref..................................the NON call of "offsides" due to the "9-yard" rule.........and the NON call of the targeting that took place during that play is the trump card.
so even if the player DIDN'T break the plane.............UNC DID IN FACT break the 9-yard rule as well as the targeting rule.
why ESPN or any other media outlet hasn't picked up on that is beyond me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [643]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 827
Joined: 12/7/15
|
Seriously?
Dec 9, 2015, 4:10 PM
|
|
> which is what the ref called for, but regardless of
> whether anybody agrees with the
> ref..................................the NON call of
> "offsides" due to the "9-yard" rule.........and the
> NON call of the targeting that took place during that
> play is the trump card.
>
> so even if the player DIDN'T break the
> plane.............UNC DID IN FACT break the 9-yard
> rule as well as the targeting rule.
>
> why ESPN or any other media outlet hasn't picked up
> on that is beyond me.
Why do you think they haven't "picked up" on that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2683]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2751
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Not correct
Dec 9, 2015, 4:28 PM
|
|
The rule says that they players must have been between the 9-yard hashmarks *AT SOME TIME* after the play is started. They don't have to line up there. The rule is to prevent you from keeping someone over near the sideline and having them be eligible to participate in the kick.
All of the UNC players, AFAIK, had been between the hashmarks at some point after the play was begun. Lining up outside the hashmarks is common on onside kicks (and regular kickoffs as well).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
