|
Replies: 20
| visibility 901
|
Orange Blooded [4679]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2609
Joined: 11/28/08
|
How is that not targeting? That is exactly
7
7
Oct 28, 2023, 3:06 PM
|
|
what they are trying to get out of the game. Leading with the helmet.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2997]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2432
Joined: 8/31/14
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:06 PM
|
|
Yeah, for real. Even announcers said that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5498]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5415
Joined: 3/9/11
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
Can’t believe they didn’t review that. Text book targeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5498]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5415
Joined: 3/9/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3222]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4841
Joined: 10/7/07
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:06 PM
|
|
Should have been reviewed at least
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36097
Joined: 8/28/00
|
If you want to know the answer
1
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
It's because his head was still "eyes up" and he hit with the forehead part and not the crown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3195]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3255
Joined: 10/19/08
|
Its forcible contact to the head or neck area.
Oct 28, 2023, 3:08 PM
|
|
Doesn’t have to be the defenders crown of the helmet. It was targeting,
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22361
Joined: 4/24/04
|
I'm not able to watch
Oct 28, 2023, 3:11 PM
|
|
but the rules are different if it's a ball carrier. They are never considered defenseless. Criteria for targeting on a ball carrier is stricter than on a defenseless player. I believe there has to be forcible contact to the head or neck area with the crown of the helmet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36097
Joined: 8/28/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1326]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 2519
Joined: 8/30/02
|
Ill have to see it again, but the two replays they showed
Oct 28, 2023, 3:09 PM
[ in reply to If you want to know the answer ] |
|
Looked like his head was down with crown leading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [119]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89
Joined: 3/22/22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [119]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89
Joined: 3/22/22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4679]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2609
Joined: 11/28/08
|
Re: If you want to know the answer
1
Oct 28, 2023, 3:10 PM
[ in reply to If you want to know the answer ] |
|
I’ve seen a lot less hits than that called targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [720]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 398
Joined: 10/7/23
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
I see it 10 or 20 times a game. It's such an arbitrary call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [235]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 105
Joined: 10/13/21
|
Textbook targeting***
1
Oct 28, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10927]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12726
Joined: 9/28/10
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:08 PM
|
|
Wake up Dabo. You should have jumped the refs. Had plenty of time to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3473]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 5158
Joined: 9/12/10
|
One of the many reasons I hate the targeting rule
Oct 28, 2023, 3:09 PM
|
|
It's called on some but not on others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1665]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1588
Joined: 10/2/00
|
Yes. Supposedly the rule was put in to prevent injuries, except that they
Oct 28, 2023, 3:10 PM
|
|
don't call it when it actually does cause an injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [237]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 458
Joined: 2/5/02
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:11 PM
|
|
Definitely a target. Hit him in the back of helmet with his helmet. But then again, a linemen can pull the shirt of a dline while tackling the ball carrier and not a sniff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [222]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 260
Joined: 6/13/13
|
Re: How is that not targeting? That is exactly
Oct 28, 2023, 3:16 PM
|
|
Yep, defenseless player falling backwards, crown of helmet to back of Ships helmet after a launch. No question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [570]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 263
Joined: 9/9/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 901
|
|
|
50
