Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Ugly DEs
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 2
| visibility 941

Ugly DEs


Aug 26, 2013, 7:41 PM

Are much bigger tha ours .. I think they are too big to be DE but what I know.. I was surprised that beasly is at 235 and thought he was at 245 during the weigh in..

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Clemson Is Coming" says Stephone Anthony (Class 2011)"
"Why NOT Clemson"
"Why Not Dabo"


Re: Ugly DEs


Aug 26, 2013, 8:27 PM

Keep in mind that they run a 3-4 defense and because of that... their DEs are similar to our DTs. And their OLBs are similar to our DEs. Check it out...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep, plus, don't get caught up in the 235-245lb debate with


Aug 26, 2013, 9:07 PM

Beasley. If you saw the weigh in, he is of bodybuilder proportions. He didn't appear to have an ounce of fat on him. He could've eatten krispy kreme for the past few weeks, fattened up to 250+, and then would have looked like most other DE in the country. Instead, he is an athletic freak. He is extremely mobile and is why he is the world leader in sacks per play.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 2
| visibility 941
Popular Board Posts
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Lucky to be 83 today but not so happy b/c

by lightbulbbill®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic