Re: How do y'all feel about Trump using the RNC to pay his legal fees?

You haven’t been paying attention. Long post needed here to explain one (and only one of several) error in your ‘shadow of a doubt’ belief.

The new (and as yet, only partially released … thanks to FedSurrection master Mitch McConnell) video footage from J6 clearly reveals that the large majority of J6 protesters who actually made it inside the Capitol Building were peaceful. This majority strolled through the Capitol Bldg, often escorted by unconcerned Capitol City police. This same majority, when in areas where the velvet ‘ropes’ were in place to channel the visitors to remain in the middle of of hallways, passively stayed within the velvet ropes. Many among this majority of inside-the-building J6’ers were arrested, convicted, and imprisoned on the charges of trespassing -&-corruptly disrupting an official proceeding. It was this latter charge by which this majority of inside-the-Capitol-Bldg J6 protesters were imprisoned.

(*). DoJ is terrified that SCOTUS will strike the charges of ‘corruptly disrupting an official proceeding’ because the case history for this offense was the outcome of the Enron investigation, and resulted in several Enron executives going to prison. There was no inference of violence about any of the convicted Enron employees, nor has there been any allegation of violence from the large majority of the ‘inside-the-Capitol-Bldg J6 protesters. The DoJ misused the Enron statute to invent a charge by which the J6 protesters could be imprisoned; the D.C. Circuit judges were either too lazy to research case law, or were colluding with the DoJ to wrongly imprison this large subset of J6 protesters.

(*). SCOTUS has already committed to review this abuse of the ‘corruptly disrupting an official proceeding’ statute; even the DoJ has altered their new indictments to exclude this (previously abused by them) statute.

(*). The net result, which will take place several months before Election Day, is that the federal government, via a conspiracy between the FBI & DoJ … and (maybe also) the D.C. District Court to wrongly imprison a bunch of peaceful J6 protesters for what will be correctly perceived by the American public as political persecution of American civilians whose crime was to be Trump supporters.

It’s coming.

RememberTheDanny

110%er [7163]

TigerPulse: 96%

Posts: 9727

Joined: 10/6/21

NY ASA was obviously to get Trump; nothing like NCs ASA law

Feb 19, 2024, 2:50 PM

Surely, you are not being sincere with your assertion that “the Adult Survivors Act was not passed specifically to go after Trump.”

Here are the details, some of which you partially captured, but some of which you (conveniently?) neglected.

E.Jean Carroll’s defamation suit was the first one; this got started after Trump went public that Ms. Carroll was FOS with her cover story in NY Magazine, in which the cover of a 2019 issue had a photo of the (now old) Ms.Carroll wearing a specific dress, with the magazine cover ‘caption’ being something similar to ‘this is the dress that I was wearing when Donald Trump sexually assaulted me 23 years ago.’ Trump publicly blasted Ms. Carroll (justifiably so, since the dress that Ms. Carroll was wearing had not even been designed, much less available for sale, until several years AFTER 1996).

Thus, Ms.Carroll’s defamation suit languished in court, but was never resolved.

Circumstantially, in 2022 when Trump started hinting about making a run to return to the WH, panic started setting in on the Democrats. For some reason, Biden admin’s policies to create high inflation rates and horrific foreign policy mistakes were not being well received by the American public. Go figure. Thus, the narrative by short sighted Democrat thought leaders was to go public with ‘Trump would not end up facing lawsuits if he just decided to go away and stay out of politics.’ Trump didn’t go away.

Enter the NY State Adult Survivors Act, which ‘coincidentally’ extended the statute of limitations to cover 1996, and when Ms. Carroll had gathered up big money Democrat agenda financiers supporters to fund her lawsuit and high powered Democrat supporter lawyers to be able to wage full scale LawFare in Trump.

So, the ‘sexual assault’ case ended up going first … filed just in time to fit within this limited duration for when the NY ASA act was in effect.

Occam’s razor favors the argument which is not dependent on a large number of assumptions and coincidences; there are simply too many coincidences in the Trump vs Carroll suits to deem as circumstantial.

BTW, your attempt to conflate the ASA argument by including NC’s ASA doesn’t work. NC’s ASA law pertains to the testing backlog of old ‘r_ _e test kits’ … I.e., actual forensic evidence … that had not been technically able to have been tested previously, but for which ‘testing technology’ is now available. The NC ASA does not pertain to hearsay sexual assault allegations from years before the statute of limitations had elapsed.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

How do y'all feel about Trump using the RNC to pay his legal fees?

Successive electoral failures in the Senate/House have proven