Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Notes from the FSU Board Meeting
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 24
| visibility 2,601

Notes from the FSU Board Meeting

4

Dec 22, 2023, 10:19 AM
Reply

An outside attorney, David Ashburn, is going through financial figures now. He said the penalty to leave the ACC is $572 million.

If that is the real # then we aren’t going anywhere…. How were we so dumb to ever agree to this grant of rights?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Notes from the FSU Board Meeting

1
2

Dec 22, 2023, 10:22 AM
Reply

a half billion seems about right...However....financing that cost over a 30 or 40 year term until the ACC dissolves and GoR becomes null could make it affordalble and profitable in the near term to go ahead and leave.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Notes from the FSU Board Meeting


Dec 22, 2023, 10:27 AM
Reply

The math will never make sense when the argument to leave is a $30m gap in revenue per year over the next 12 years. The total gap is $360 million which is roughly 40% less than the cost to get out of the deal

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Notes from the FSU Board Meeting


Dec 22, 2023, 11:29 AM
Reply

Yes. So gap equals 360. But penalty is +500? What new math is this employing that this makes economic sense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Notes from the FSU Board Meeting

1

Dec 22, 2023, 10:27 AM
Reply

He also believes in not enforceable. Gonna get good.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FSU is challenging the GOR.

8

Dec 22, 2023, 10:30 AM
Reply

Attorney is now laying out the legal grounds for the challenge. I'm no attorney, but here are some bullet points.

1. GOR is unconstitutional with respect to FL law.
2. GOR is unenforcable.
3. GOR was illegally made.

He gave other information, but like I said, I am no lawyer.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson's lawyers better be taking notes!***


Dec 22, 2023, 10:34 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bliss***


Dec 22, 2023, 10:37 AM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-francismarion.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've played multiple sports and would bet any amount that I'm still more athletic than you at this present time...."


convincing FSU to pay him thinking they can beat it - my guess, this is an L

2

Dec 22, 2023, 10:37 AM [ in reply to FSU is challenging the GOR. ]
Reply

of the $572 million + another $10-$15 mil in legal fees.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FSU is challenging the GOR.

1

Dec 22, 2023, 10:38 AM [ in reply to FSU is challenging the GOR. ]
Reply

Also arguing the ACC hasn't held up their end of the bargain. This is all good news not only for FSU but hopefully Clemson. I'm just curious how long this legal battle will take.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FSU is challenging the GOR.


Dec 22, 2023, 10:41 AM
Reply

I dont know, but I can guarantee its headed to the US Supreme court. Seems like FSU's first and foremost challenge is that the buyout violates Florida law. However I think this can only be challenged in a federal court.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: FSU is challenging the GOR.


Dec 22, 2023, 10:40 AM [ in reply to FSU is challenging the GOR. ]
Reply

The problem with most lawyers arguments is they are coming from a lawyer. The upside is that they are then heard by a former lawyer so there is always the chance two lying sack of bits stumble on the same contorted conclusion. And of course they are arguing about a document created by - you guessed it - a team of lawyers. It’s why the person with the weaker argument wants a trial - it’s a crapshoot. Imagine the financial “incentives” a judge hearing that case might receive from entities such as ESPN, SEC, etc etc.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FSU is challenging the GOR.


Dec 22, 2023, 10:43 AM
Reply

whats been stated is by far not a crap shoot. FSU has some very strong arguments. Anti-trust being a huge one. And the US governement has been cracking down on major corps and anti trust lawsuits a ton lately

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: FSU is challenging the GOR.

1

Dec 22, 2023, 10:41 AM [ in reply to FSU is challenging the GOR. ]
Reply

The attorney laid things out like FSU will seek a judgment against the ACC that basically declares gross negligence in the management of the ACC member institutions' ability to maximize revenue, specifically through media rights.

It seems to me that the challenge is going to be as basic as the ACC has not acted in good faith on behalf of it's member institutions. I'd be shocked if the GOR is upheld in court cases to challenge it simply based on the revenue figures that would be presented from other conference media deals.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FSU is challenging the GOR.


Dec 22, 2023, 10:55 AM
Reply

Wow. This is the argument I have been stating on this forum for quite a while now.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Notes from the FSU Board Meeting

2

Dec 22, 2023, 10:47 AM
Reply

In case we forget........thanks again Commissioner Swofford. I don't know how one man could muck something up so bad but you did it. Congratulations!

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Presidents are just as responsible for signing on.***


Dec 22, 2023, 10:58 AM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The presidents did not vote on extension GR in 2017.


Dec 22, 2023, 11:24 AM
Reply

That is one of the points of the suit. Swofford negotiated it with ESPN. The presidents never saw the document, much less voted on it.

One of the 7 points of the suit is that Swofford failed to act as a fiduciary for FSU in the negotiations.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The presidents did not vote on extension GR in 2017.

1

Dec 22, 2023, 11:26 AM
Reply

Correct

OP...go back and listen to the presentation by David Ashburn. He also state the conference commissioner was relaying information in the best interest of preservation of the ACC and not in the best interest of the schools within the conference.

The GOR is about to get destroyed. The exit penalty will stand to a point, but that GOR is about to get hammered.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Penalty fee.


Dec 22, 2023, 11:31 AM
Reply

The attorney also had an argument about penalty fees in contracts. The penalty can only be commensurate with what the party will actually lose if the contract is breached. It cannot be unreasonable.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The presidents did not vote on extension GR in 2017.


Dec 22, 2023, 11:28 AM [ in reply to The presidents did not vote on extension GR in 2017. ]
Reply

Finally a new piece of info, at least it is new to me.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FSU filing a suit in court this morning.


Dec 22, 2023, 11:22 AM
Reply

7 counts.

From what I can understand they are challenging the legality of the GOR on 7 counts. One of the biggest seems to be that they are claiming the ACC did not act as a fiduciary for the members (specifically FSU) when they negotiated the extension of the GOR in 2017.

Some of you attorneys on this board can explain far better than I.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Notes from the FSU Board Meeting

1

Dec 22, 2023, 11:23 AM
Reply

If you listened to David he stated that the last extension was executed by the the conference commissioner without any input from the schools

That was one of the case points.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I may be off base but I am of the opinion that when Swofford cut the deal, he


Dec 22, 2023, 11:49 AM
Reply

made sure that Jefferson Pilot was a part of it...to the tune of $500M,AND THAT HIS SON GOT THE CONTRACT AS PURCHASING AGENT FOR JEFFERSON PILOT...If that is true, well, I can see how a member could make the case that the Fiduciary Trust had been broken. In my business, that is a very big deal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lest people get too excited, thinking....


Dec 22, 2023, 11:29 AM
Reply

.... FSU has found a way out and other schools will soon follow, remember this.

FSU hired a great legal firm with great lawyers who did a great job presenting FSU's case.

Well, the ACC also has great lawyers who will present a great case for the ACC.

Both sides will be very convincing to the public, depending on which side you want to believe.

FSU fans will love the argument they just heard this morning. Kirk and Paul will scoff at it and will say it has zero legal merit and is just a bunch of whining by a group of sore losers.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 24
| visibility 2,601
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic