Good lord liberals are delusional .... Middle East turmoil

Sep 13, 2012, 8:15 AM

You folks are helping Obama try and spin the story. Nothing new there!!

You are ignoring some huge pieces of evidence that destroy your spin job, errr, the White House spin job, that the Cairo embassy issued the statement first.

We don't know the exact timeline, only folks in the middle east do, but here is what we do know ...

1. There are now 3 countries attacking our embassies and more could be brewing.

2. Barry is just flat stupid. Despite high levels of unrest in that region and our 3 recent/current military actions there, plus killing Bin Laden, plus the drone attacks, and it being the anniversary of 9/11, the anointed one didn't boost security around our embassies, nor plan to do anything in remembrance of 9/11. What did he do? He had plans to fly to Nevada to campaign. What a freakin' idiot!!!

3. Obama has gotten everything wrong since the Arab spring started. EVERYONE was telling the left not to support those revolts that tings were too unstable in the region and these countries would be taken over by radical like the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama and the know it all's on the left said that was nonsense. As usual, they were totally wrong.

And here are the fatal flaws in your/the White House's spin on this ...

1. IF the statement was released 1st, why was it only released by the Cairo embassy? If we know there is something controversial out there like the Youtube video that is causing problems, and the administration deems a public statement/apology the proper action to take, wouldn't the smart thing be for Obama to go on TV and address ALL Muslims? Or have every embassy in Muslim dominant countries release statements? Or both!! It's common sense.

Instead, you want us to believe that the Cairo embassy unilaterally, without talking to the White House, decided to put out an obviously rushed and clumsy statement that was released before any serious unrest or chaos? Furthermore, that it's a coincidence that the Cairo embassy releases an unauthorized statement and it was that embassy that was later attacked?

Seriously? And a huge coincidence at that. Yea, right!!

The way you liberals spin and treat the American public like rubes is astronomically mind boggling. Thinking Americans find such BS highly insulting.

2. The initial White House response was to totally distanced itself from the statement. Then hold a press conference to distance themselves further and release their own statement only after Romney had beat them the punch. Like he beat them to New Orleans after the hurricane.

3. If there was time to do the public statement first, the embassy would have taken the time to coordinate with the White House and the statement would have been far better written. Additionally, as stated above, common sense and logic dictate all embassies would have released statements and Obama would have addressed the Muslim world, if not before the first riot, shortly thereafter.

4. If the statement came first, how did they get everything above wrong and not release a timeline till much later in the day? They would have included the timeline far earlier.

Here is what really happened when piecing together what we know ...

This video has been out for a while, it's not new. The riot in Libya is revenge for drone Al Qaeda executions and was a smoke scream for the highly planned and well executed terrorist attack to kill the ambassador. These other riots were instigated to help distract as well from the attack in Libya ignored. Obama ignored yesterday was 9/11 and didn't anticipate & prepare and got caught with his pants down. The riot started in Cairo and the embassy quickly rushed an apologetic statement to cool tensions. The riots/attack started in Libya. Romney addressed the situation. The White House tries to distance itself from the Cairo embassies actions. Obama & Hillary make a public statement and start the spinning and damage control. The ambassador to Libya is killed and the Pentagon and intel folks leak this was not a riot, but highly coordinated terrorist attack. The White House suddenly releases a detailed timeline and Obama does what he does best, interviews with sympathetic reporters and spins the story. Still no cohesive statement nor address from the White House. Today there are 3 countries attacking our embassies and we have an empty suit & clown for president. And liberal mainstream media outlets are releasing this late breaking miraculous timeline to help salvage Obama's image and to try and hurt Romney.

This thing is getting worse an more evidence coming to highlight how incompetent Obama is!!

Our President, Valarie Jarrett, oops, Barry Obama, is in so far over head he is drowning and the tide is coming in and still far from high.

Spin, Forrest, Spin!!

By the way, from PolitiFact.com, which has proven itself to be somewhat biased towards Obama despite its claims otherwise, release this ...

----------------------------------------------------------
First, the U.S. embassy released its statement at least several hours before protesters stormed the U.S. compound in Cairo -- and well before the attack in Libya took place. So the statement was not made in response to the storming of the Cairo embassy, nor to the killings in Benghazi.

It’s possible, however, that protesters had already amassed at the embassy by the time the statement was released; that’s not clear from the media reports we’ve seen. And there are reports, not backed up by the current embassy Twitter feed, that the embassy did reiterate the original statement via Twitter several hours after the embassy was breached.

Second, Romney’s initial statement on the evening of Sept. 11 calling the administration’s response "disgraceful" was made with knowledge of how the Cairo incident ended, but before the announcement of the deaths in Libya. On the other hand, significant details about both events were available by the time he made his comments on the morning of Sept. 12.

And third, the ABC News report suggests that even the White House was having jitters about the embassy statement after the fact, saying that it didn’t reflect the views of the U.S. government.
----------------------------------------------------------

Important points ...

1. There is no evidence of proof or definitive timeline of events, only what we've been told.

2. Obama said Romney was commenting on things as they happened and before we knew the outcome, but this proves that was false. And Romney has too many high level contacts. He would have known before the public that our ambassador was dead.

3. If the statement came from the embassy before tensions flared as the Obama admin wants us to believe, why was the statement so poorly written, why didn't they coordinate with the White House, why didn't ALL embassies issue statements, and why would the White House need to distance itself?

It's far more reasonable to believe and forgive the embassy if it did this at the height of tensions to try and defuse a dangerous situation. And in that scenario the White House is covered and can simply say, "While we disagree with the wording, we understand why it was done. Thankfully no one died in Cairo like in Libya."

But that's not what they did. The whole thing stinks and defies logic. The stories and facts just don't jive. Typical Obama ... damage control and spin aided by allies in the media after the fact.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Good lord liberals are delusional .... Middle East turmoil

Good lord, if I had that much bull #### running around....

And you think those facts are more important?***

If that's gonna happen, I just hope Conservatives grab a

Possible, and....

Lol! You do have a way of doing that.***

I've seen most people supporting his comments as do I,

LMAO. I think the same thing when I read some posts***

Look navy, I have been bestowed a thumbs down.....

The polls for likely voters say its dead even. The economy

Careful,

Re: Good lord, if I had that much bull #### running around....

TigerBoard POTD