Does everyone have the right to hear from ALL the committee members on their thought process and how they voted.
I understand a close door meeting to discuss but once the vote is finalized does everyone deserve to know who voted for what and reasoning behind their decision and have faith that it's was a rational discussion?
Otherwise we will never know if it was "fair" and "impartial" vote. They could all be there just discussing on how to get particular teams or conference in. It seems to me that there are some accountability issues without hearing from ALL committee members not just the chairman which can sugarcoat his speech any way he wants (which they could have discussed on what to say)