Here is the language on the new goaltending review rule -

Feb 24, 2024, 11:53 PM

11-2.1.b
Goaltending/basket interference)

To allow officials the opportunity to review goaltending/basket interference calls during the next
media timeout to ensure the call was accurate so long as the official makes the goaltending/basket
interference call on the floor. If there is a foul on the shooter while the ball is in the air with a
goaltend/basket interference, the review will be immediate to properly adjudicate the potential free
throws. (Note: Under four minutes remaining in the second period and the entire overtime period(s),
these reviews will be conducted immediately.)

Rationale: Goaltending/basket interference is one of the most challenging plays to officiate, and
these violations directly result in either awarding or disallowing points. The rules committee
concluded that it was imperative to review these plays. (Note: These reviews will be consistent with
how officials currently review whether a successful try is a two- or a three-point try.)

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Wonder what the rules is in the other direction - if no goal tending was called but it was actually goaltending upon further review. Would they give the team 2 points (like they took away 2 points)? Why ignore the fact that Girard got the ball after the called goaltending and scored - seems unfair to not consider that when taking away points. We get penalized because of the refs mistake, if they had not called goal tending, we'd have those 2 points from Girard's put back.

Also, justification that this is like 2 vs. 3 point review at the next time out seems like a poor argument. In that case, you are deciding between 2 or 3 points. The team made the shot - no disregarding the make. In the goaltending case you are deciding between 2 or 0 points and ignoring what happened after the goaltending call (e.g., Girard got the rebound and scored).

It looks like to me if goal tending is not called, and later you see that it

Re: It looks like to me if goal tending is not called, and later you see that it

Here is the language on the new goaltending review rule -

Re: Here is the language on the new goaltending review rule -

It looks like to me if goal tending is not called, and later you see that it

Re: It looks like to me if goal tending is not called, and later you see that it

TigerBoard POTD