|
Replies: 14
| visibility 951
|
Orange Blooded [2243]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1832
Joined: 12/1/07
|
Guess Renfrow is
2
Oct 31, 2023, 4:14 PM
|
|
Stuck with the raiders for the rest of the year. Shame, past the trade deadline now.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [16158]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26449
Joined: 11/18/03
|
If they had any intention of trading him, they wouldn't have let him play
1
Oct 31, 2023, 4:15 PM
|
|
last night and risk an injury
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6171]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5091
Joined: 8/30/17
|
Re: If they had any intention of trading him, they wouldn't have let him play
Oct 31, 2023, 6:10 PM
|
|
I could see some of the routes they had him run on replays from behind the QB and most were stupid. He would get inside the guy and instead of just running to increase the angle away from the defender like you know Renfrow would he curled back behind the guy basically covering himself. Others he was clearly a decoy because instead of sitting down in wide open space he crossed back into an area with a defender nearby. Their scheme is broken beyond repair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3615]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 8864
Joined: 5/16/22
|
Re: Guess Renfrow is
Oct 31, 2023, 4:15 PM
|
|
He will be a free agent next season, unless the Raiders decide to keep him, which is unleikely. He will take a big pay cut, but I wonder where he ends up? At least he will have more options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [415]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 629
Joined: 11/14/14
|
yes, he will have a pay cut, but...
1
Oct 31, 2023, 4:18 PM
|
|
... are there not some minimum levels that would apply to him based on years in league? Either way, he si set for life, but if they use him more and he can get 50+ receptions he could get a decent contract. (still likely a paycut for sure)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [595]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 761
Joined: 1/8/19
|
Re: Guess Renfrow is
1
Oct 31, 2023, 4:19 PM
[ in reply to Re: Guess Renfrow is ] |
|
Davonte Adams has put it in park.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16158]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26449
Joined: 11/18/03
|
He can make it back with performance incentives***
1
Oct 31, 2023, 5:04 PM
[ in reply to Re: Guess Renfrow is ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13530]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8951
Joined: 8/30/18
|
Re: Guess Renfrow is
Oct 31, 2023, 5:16 PM
[ in reply to Re: Guess Renfrow is ] |
|
And he still gets his guaranteed money…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3615]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 8864
Joined: 5/16/22
|
Re: Guess Renfrow is
Oct 31, 2023, 5:19 PM
|
|
It will be interesting to see what his guaranteed money will be next year. It will be fun to see where he goes where he can hit those incentives. Looking foward to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4884]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4949
Joined: 1/4/06
|
the raiders will have a new coach next year
2
Oct 31, 2023, 4:19 PM
|
|
josh mcdaniels is toast
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3615]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 8864
Joined: 5/16/22
|
Re: the raiders will have a new coach next year
Oct 31, 2023, 4:23 PM
|
|
They're in a total rebuild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13253]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10000
Joined: 5/11/99
|
Josh McDaniels is not toast....
Oct 31, 2023, 4:52 PM
[ in reply to the raiders will have a new coach next year ] |
|
He's a Bill Belichick wanna be a$$hat.
9 former Patriots have been acquired since McDaniles got to Raiders. He's not Bill Belichick, but he thinks he is and the players see right through it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10936]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7968
Joined: 10/18/16
|
Re: Josh McDaniels is not toast....
Oct 31, 2023, 5:17 PM
|
|
Do you think he has called Brady to try and make it an even 10? Yes, yes, I know the Brady ship has sailed off into the sunset but Brady made the difference for Belichick and McDaniels. NE didn't win because of McDaniels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13253]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10000
Joined: 5/11/99
|
You know he has
Oct 31, 2023, 6:02 PM
|
|
Nothing to lose right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16961]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4607
Joined: 1/31/16
|
Re: Guess Renfrow is
Oct 31, 2023, 5:01 PM
|
|
Definitely sucks for Hunter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 951
|
|
|
50
