Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Expansion Attractiveness Graph
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 20
| visibility 1,751

Expansion Attractiveness Graph

2

Dec 9, 2023, 9:36 AM
Reply

https://twitter.com/TJAltimore/status/1733490261420835098

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph

1

Dec 9, 2023, 9:37 AM
Reply

You beat my post by seconds....

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Interesting that they correlate the academic ranking and sports viewership as th

1

Dec 9, 2023, 9:45 AM
Reply

Maybe a weighted stat of football win pct combined with basketball ein pct correlated to the avg viewer ratings in those sports.

But it always strikes me when I see how far Clemson has dropped in the “best universities” rankings. We were in the top 25 while I was there. Especially relative to schools like VT and FSU.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wasn't that "top 25 public colleges"? This apparently uses all colleges.***

2

Dec 9, 2023, 9:52 AM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yup, thats correct. I said that poorly.


Dec 9, 2023, 9:59 AM
Reply

But now we’re 43 in that same ranking (86 overall).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Interesting that they correlate the academic ranking and sports viewership as th


Dec 9, 2023, 10:15 AM [ in reply to Interesting that they correlate the academic ranking and sports viewership as th ]
Reply

About 7 or 8 years ago we were #60 overall, tied with UGA, and in the middle of the ACC pack academically, & would've been 3rd or 4th in the SEC. What is happening? Steady drop since then.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Interesting that they correlate the academic ranking and sports viewership as th

2
1

Dec 9, 2023, 11:01 AM
Reply

US News HATES Clemson. WSJ does too. Other rankings (e.g.: Niche, Princeton Review) has CU between 50-75, usually around VA Tech.

It's like anyplace that doesn't ridicule people of faith get pushed down the rankings.

For the graph, though, isn't the left axis the only thing that matters?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph


Dec 9, 2023, 10:04 AM
Reply

What most people fail to understand is that someone (a network) has to foot the bill for expansion. And the people paying the bills ONLY care about eyeballs.

1. ND
2. Clemson/FSU is a near tie
3. Everybody else.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Based on this graph it appears Clemson is


Dec 9, 2023, 11:01 AM
Reply

a fair amount closer to ND than FSU is to Clemson FWIW

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Based on this graph it appears Clemson is

1

Dec 9, 2023, 11:15 AM
Reply

I adjusted it based on Clemson having great success over that time frame, while FSU was down. I think they are both below ND and in a virtual dead heat with each other, then a fairly large gap to anyone else.

Those that think UNC and UVA are above Clemson in the pecking order are just flat wrong. I do believe all 4 will get B1G invites, but UNC and UVA may be offered 50% shares for a few years. Clemson and FSU will get full shares. JMHO. ESPN is not paying for additional members. So the SEC will not be adding.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph

1

Dec 9, 2023, 11:17 AM [ in reply to Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph ]
Reply

Correct. Follow the money and you’ll find the answer. It makes me laugh when I hear talking heads factoring in Academic ratings with realignment. That item is is NOT a talking point for the networks writing checks.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So long as ND gets that NBC TV contract money and has a path to the playoff

1

Dec 9, 2023, 11:35 AM [ in reply to Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph ]
Reply

they are a non-consideration for expansion because they aren't joining a conference in football. Furthermore - because of John Swofford's sweetheart deal to give an ACC bowl tie-in to ND - they even have more reason to avoid the whole conference gig.

If it were up to me - the new CFP format would be Conference Champs ONLY (Power 5 and Group of 5) and no one else. That would force ND into a conference so they would obviously object to that format as would probably the SEC/Big10. But if we want a system that really settles things "on the field" like the NFL, then having a Conference Champion only playoff tournament is about the only way to do it while keeping the schedule to a max of 16 games played by any given team...

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So long as ND gets that NBC TV contract money and has a path to the playoff


Dec 9, 2023, 12:17 PM
Reply

That format makes no sense at all. Why should group of 5 get the same number, or more, of entrants into a tournament for the natty as the P5 does?

You cannot weight P5 and G5 evenly.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph


Dec 9, 2023, 11:48 AM [ in reply to Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph ]
Reply

Correct. Many are still living in the realities of 5-10 years ago when expansion was about markets and recruiting territory. Now that the games are available anywhere, the markets are less relevant as you’re going to reach the same amount of eyeballs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I just wish they would get it done and over with tired of talking about it***


Dec 9, 2023, 10:06 AM
Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I just wish they would get it done and over with tired of talking about it***


Dec 9, 2023, 12:40 PM
Reply

Yet here you are. 🤷

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph


Dec 9, 2023, 10:26 AM
Reply

Well that can't be right because FSU has been yelling to everyone that they are the most watched program in the ACC. Oh, they were only talking about this year when they had their best record in a decade and Clemson had it's worst in a decade. It's almost as if they were lying.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph

2

Dec 9, 2023, 10:49 AM
Reply

You can make the graph tell you whatever you want. Be interesting to change the date range to 2021-2023 and see where Clemson is then.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clearly 3 are head and shoulders above the rest.


Dec 9, 2023, 11:55 AM
Reply

ND could pick it's conference anytime it wants. But, right now it doesn't want one.

Clemson and FSU are a huge cut above the rest.

All those guys with the money (Fox and espn) just need to figure out a way to get them out of the ACC. That is, if the money guys want them out of the ACC.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Of course, the schools the ACC brings in are at the very bottom...


Dec 9, 2023, 12:00 PM
Reply

...Cal, SMU, and Stanford.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Expansion Attractiveness Graph

1

Dec 9, 2023, 12:02 PM
Reply

That tigerbalm poster is is a very handsome dude, I’m sure that helps our numbers a lot!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 20
| visibility 1,751
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic