Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Health Care.....show of hands....
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Replies: 26
| visibility 451

Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 26, 2024, 2:34 PM
Reply

How many people were aware that the ACA (and its precursor in Massachusetts, aka RomneyCare) were based on the same framework as a proposal from the Heritage Foundation given in 1989?

https://www.heritage.org/social-security/report/assuring-affordable-health-care-all-americans

There are differences in the ACA and what Heritage was proposing. But a few things were very much the same or similar:

1) A Medicaid Expansion.

2) An Individual Mandate to buy insurance.

3) Subsidies for people who were too sick or too poor to afford it.

It's not fashionable to say that the ACA was based on a fairly conservative proposal. But it was. The heritage plan had a three-legged stool, where everyone had to buy and where there was always something that would be available and finally subsidies for people who couldn't afford it.

I admit that when the ACA was signed into law, I thought it might collapse, and I didn't support it. But that collapse hasn't happened. It's actually done better than I thought. The individual mandate was done away with. So, getting to Universal healthcare won't be possible under the ACA. But it has been a positive step in that direction. Due to the ACA, the ranks of uninsured in this country has been roughly cut in half from 15-20% to about 7-9%...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep. That came up quite often when ACA passed.***

1

Feb 26, 2024, 2:36 PM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Yep. That came up quite often when ACA passed.***

1

Feb 26, 2024, 2:48 PM
Reply

Here's a chart of uninsured by year. It plummeted after full ACA implementation.

https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/indicator/access-affordability/percent-uninsured/

There needs to be more changes in the system. The ACA was only a partial fix of the quilt at best. But it has helped somewhat.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 26, 2024, 2:45 PM
Reply

My understanding is that a lot of these ideas go back to the Nixon administration, which was probably on par with Obama's from a policy perspective.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....

1

Feb 26, 2024, 2:53 PM
Reply

This is why MAGAts have no replacement for Obamacare. It's a conservative idea that they pretend is woke. Obama checkmate them and they are forever stuck on this. 😆

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 27, 2024, 4:26 PM
Reply

the replacement for Obama care is natural selection. Get a job, earn money and buy insurance or don't.

You should like that because it reduces the carbon footprint of humanity.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 27, 2024, 9:46 PM
Reply

That was working so well prior to the ACA. LOL. Why do you hate small business and the people who worked for them?




2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 27, 2024, 10:05 PM [ in reply to Re: Health Care.....show of hands.... ]
Reply

NC Tiger, huge props for comedy, thanks shedding for sharing your comically ridiculous naive proposals.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Every bill since the ACA has passed includes more funding for the ACA

1

Feb 26, 2024, 2:54 PM
Reply

It is an absolute failure and has been funded 5000% more than budgeted.

"But that collapse hasn't happened. It's actually done better than I thought."

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Every bill since the ACA has passed includes more funding for the ACA


Feb 26, 2024, 3:03 PM
Reply

By what measures is it an "absolute failure"?

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"You like your doctor, you can keep your doctor."***


Feb 26, 2024, 4:18 PM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

https://as1.ftcdn.net/v2/jpg/00/81/16/28/1000_F_81162810_8TlZDomtVuVGlyqWL2I4HA7Wlqw7cr5a.jpg


Re: "You like your doctor, you can keep your doctor."***


Feb 26, 2024, 8:12 PM
Reply

That's all your googling efforts could come up with?




2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The vast majority of people did keep their doctor....


Feb 28, 2024, 9:00 AM [ in reply to "You like your doctor, you can keep your doctor."*** ]
Reply

Most people were not affected by the ACA in terms of their doctor & keeping their health insurance they already had at work.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The problem with the ACA....


Feb 26, 2024, 4:36 PM [ in reply to Re: Every bill since the ACA has passed includes more funding for the ACA ]
Reply

is that it didn't fail. The hard right desperately wanted it to fail. But it wouldn't comply with their wishes. The death spiral that was predicted by the hard right never occurred.

Not only did it cut the uninsured in half, but it did so without costs going up as a % of gdp. We actually slowed healthcare cost growth while insuring more people.

To get to full UHC though, more has to be done. The ACA wasn't nearly enough.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

JFC . Is everyone brain dead today

2

Feb 26, 2024, 8:19 PM
Reply

What part of that it can’t sustain itself by a factor of 5000, means it’s not an abject failure. Every year billions of additional funds are needed to keep it afloat. The mandate was the only thing that raised a couple of dollars for it.

FAIL!!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 26, 2024, 3:02 PM
Reply

Yes, and not only that, but McCain favored the individual mandate while Obama did not. What was passed was as much or more the Heritage Foundation/McCain/Romney version than it was Obama version.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 26, 2024, 3:43 PM
Reply

So more people are covered but we are all paying out the wazoo compared to what we paid before this boondoggle was passed. Only pointing out half of the equation and using it as some kind of proof of success is disingenuous at best and an outright lie at worst. And who cares who thought up this terrible idea first fifty years ago? What a bizarre and completely irrelevant defense of a horrible piece of legislation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I agree that healthcare is still too expensive in this country....


Feb 26, 2024, 3:53 PM
Reply

But the rate of health care spending growth has slowed since the ACA came into being. If you scroll down in the link, the total healthcare spending to GDP ratio has been flat since 2010, which is the first year of the ACA. It's been right around 17%. There was a big bump in healthcare-to-gdp spending during the decade from 2000 to 2010. It went from 13% to 17%. Since then, not so much.

https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/u-s-spending-healthcare-changed-time/#Total%20national%20health%20expenditures,%20US%20$%20per%20capita,%201970-2022

So, I would say that the ACA has been somewhat successful in limiting healthcare spending growth, or at least it hasn't made it worse.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 26, 2024, 6:08 PM [ in reply to Re: Health Care.....show of hands.... ]
Reply

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/11/12/934146128/despite-aca-coverage-gains-millions-still-suffer-catastrophic-health-care-costs

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg2013_nascar_champ.gif2014_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


This is true....


Feb 26, 2024, 6:45 PM
Reply

There are still people who are uninsured and people who are underinsured. More reform is needed. Biden's IRA bill allows for drug price negotiations, and increased subsidies for policies that are bought on the exchange. It's incremental improvement. But much more is needed.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Market forces


Feb 26, 2024, 7:30 PM
Reply

might be something to consider. There is essentially no competition on price between hospitals or physicians.

More government intervention which is already considerable will only lead to a least common denominator product.

It will not be any cheaper if the California model of offering MediCal to ALL illegal aliens is adopted by more states. The Medicaid budget will explode.

It’s a problem Solomon would struggle with, but leaving it all up to politicians is unlikely to produce a good result.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's a limited amount of "market forces"....


Feb 26, 2024, 10:17 PM
Reply

that can assist us with healthcare costs in the US. I think markets apply quite well in areas where treatments & surgeries are optional, and customers have choices. It's not easy to apply market forces when the customer is the victim of a heart attack or a stroke or a serious injury from a car accident.

Now, when we compare the US to other countries, our system is far more private and profit-driven than those other countries. We have mostly private doctors/providers, in private clinics or private hospitals, serving a customer base that is largely using private insurance or insurance that their private employer self-insures or has negotiated with a private insurance entity. And even when people have Medicare or Medicaid, they're often using private entities in Medicare Advantage or private administrators in Medicaid HMO plans. For some people, around 20 million or so, who buy their insurance on the ACA exchanges, they're buying from a private insurer and often choosing between various plans that are offered by more than one insurer.

Compared to other countries, we are much more "market-based" and/or private-based than any other country. However, those other countries, which are all supposedly socialist hellholes, cover their entire population and spend far less money on healthcare than we do, and they typically have longer lifespans, too.

I'm not advocating that we copy another country. But I am advocating that our system needs changes, and that we can look at what other countries are doing better than us, and occasionally borrow an idea or two from them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: There's a limited amount of "market forces"....


Feb 27, 2024, 7:25 AM
Reply

gosmitty said:

that can assist us with healthcare costs in the US. I think markets apply quite well in areas where treatments & surgeries are optional, and customers have choices. It's not easy to apply market forces when the customer is the victim of a heart attack or a stroke or a serious injury from a car accident.

Now, when we compare the US to other countries, our system is far more private and profit-driven than those other countries. We have mostly private doctors/providers, in private clinics or private hospitals, serving a customer base that is largely using private insurance or insurance that their private employer self-insures or has negotiated with a private insurance entity. And even when people have Medicare or Medicaid, they're often using private entities in Medicare Advantage or private administrators in Medicaid HMO plans. For some people, around 20 million or so, who buy their insurance on the ACA exchanges, they're buying from a private insurer and often choosing between various plans that are offered by more than one insurer.

Compared to other countries, we are much more "market-based" and/or private-based than any other country. However, those other countries, which are all supposedly socialist hellholes, cover their entire population and spend far less money on healthcare than we do, and they typically have longer lifespans, too.

I'm not advocating that we copy another country. But I am advocating that our system needs changes, and that we can look at what other countries are doing better than us, and occasionally borrow an idea or two from them.




Well roughly 90% of surgeries are elective, not necessarily optional, but not emergent. There is essentially no price competition among surgeons. Insurance pays at a fixed rate. Medicare or Medicaid pays the surgeon at a fixed rate within the same state.

For the most part, hospitals are likewise paid the same amounts.

Heart attacks are common admissions. There is a lot of standardization on treatments. If market forces were in play I'm sure the hospitals and Cardiologists would compete on cost.

Of course we need a safety net for those who can't pay.

Furthermore, it is a ridiculous myth that people are turned away for treatment of heart attacks, strokes, cancer or injuries due to a negative wallot biopsy.Those with no money are treated.

I totally agree that we can do better and all options should be explored, but before we jump on a nationalized health care system, encouraging competition among doctors and hospitals with full transparency of pricing would be a help.

The current system where the patient typically along with the doctor is clueless about costs since 3rd payers are involved does nothing to lower costs.

A pure market driven medical system is probably not feasible, but let's at least try it in some low risk areas such as with primary care. What does Dr A charge for a routine checkup vs Dr B? What does Dr A Ortho charge for a knee arthroscopy vs Dr B Ortho?

Alas, lower price doesn't necessarily equal better quality, but as long as Dr's and patients are at multiple arm's lengths away on the costs of healthcare, costs will never be reigned in.

If the Feds totally take over health care, there will ultimately have to be rationing.

Much of the problem is us. We are a nation of fat people who do little in the way of exercise. That is a huge problem that perhaps could be better incentivized even now more than it is by Insurers.

It's a very difficult problem, but I feel market forces need to be expanded rather than reduced further.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think more price transparency is a good thing....


Feb 27, 2024, 9:41 AM
Reply

I think some laws were passed during the Trump years that helped with that, although more is needed. I agree with alot of what you're saying, at least to a point. I also thinking giving medicare bargaining power with big pharma will help lower costs for seniors.

Rationing already occurs, btw. Emergency rooms have to treat people when they show up. But bureaucrats will deny coverage for this or that treatment or prescription all the time. And people without health insurance will put off check-ups & treatments due to inability or perceived inability to pay. Some doctors don't accept Medicaid patients. Rationing is already part of our system that is so private based.

I don't think America needs a nationalized system like the UK or "Medicare for All". I think we need to build on the system we have in place already, which uses private insurance for more than half the country. But we will need a stronger government hand in order to get to full UHC.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Health Care.....show of hands....


Feb 26, 2024, 8:14 PM [ in reply to Re: Health Care.....show of hands.... ]
Reply

Can you back this up?

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How many people know if


Feb 27, 2024, 4:25 PM
Reply

the gov't gets involved in anything, it gets effed up?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: How many people know if


Feb 28, 2024, 7:19 AM
Reply

How does the free market work for healthcare? 😆

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 26
| visibility 451
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic