Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TRUMP 2nd Term now a foregone conclusion
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 13
| visibility 1

TRUMP 2nd Term now a foregone conclusion


Oct 26, 2020, 8:36 PM

ACB gonna spoil the Dems corrupt Election conspiracy!

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TRUMP 2nd Term now a foregone conclusion


Oct 26, 2020, 8:41 PM



2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick?


Oct 26, 2020, 8:42 PM

So what you’re saying, if l’m deciphering your hyperpartisan drivel correctly, is that when Trump loses the election he can fight it in court and challenge every ruling against him until he gets to the Supreme Court and then they’ll rule in his favor because he appointed three of the justices?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick?


Oct 26, 2020, 8:48 PM

NO! I'm saying an Honest, Non-partisan, extremely qualified Justice who understands the Constitution & The Law will easily be able to see that the VOTE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE in our election process is not compromised.

That's what an apolitical court does.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Can someone kindly shoot me in the head or


Oct 26, 2020, 8:50 PM

give me AIDS so that I don't have to do this anymore?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Can someone kindly shoot me in the head or


Oct 27, 2020, 12:22 PM

stubborn_tiger® Pubs cured aids (for the most part). If you can get fat, COVID might do the trick.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Is there a one person Supreme Court now?***


Oct 26, 2020, 8:58 PM [ in reply to Re: Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick? ]



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Why would the vote need to go to the SCOTUS?


Oct 26, 2020, 10:44 PM [ in reply to Re: Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick? ]

Trump is going to get curbstomped in the election. What you're advocating is the court trying to overturn a fair election.

Which let's be honest. That's what you want.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Why would the vote need to go to the SCOTUS?


Oct 26, 2020, 10:49 PM

If you are talking to me then you replied to the wrong person.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not talking to you, Broseph.***


Oct 26, 2020, 10:51 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick?


Oct 26, 2020, 9:05 PM [ in reply to Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick? ]

I think he is saying all those mail in ballots that cannot be verified will be thrown out. The Dem. will sue and the court will conclude the ballots are not legal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How would that many ballots not be verified?


Oct 27, 2020, 10:03 AM

Just because they are counted after Nov. 3?

Please.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: How would that many ballots not be verified?


Oct 27, 2020, 10:10 AM

The same way that "pregnant chads" weren't counted in Florida in 2000. Technicalities to throw out legitimate under a supposition of fraud.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick?


Oct 27, 2020, 12:26 PM [ in reply to Re: Can you walk us through this reasoning real quick? ]

Using the liberal logic of

"We know of laws in the past that were later proven wrong, so we are just going to assume we know current laws that will later be proven wrong and disobey those because we are fighting for a legit purpose"

in this discussion.

I'm okay with throwing away any mail-in ballot because we all know (and all scientists agree) that mail-in ballots are ripe for fraud and someday, when everyone is woke, they won't be allowed. So, we will just ensure by breaking the law (albeit we know one day the law will be gone) we get it right this time.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 13
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic