Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 17
| visibility 1

According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul


Feb 11, 2015, 4:51 PM

Section 1. Personal Fouls

Art. 1. A player shall not hold, displace, push, charge, trip or impede the progress
of an opponent by extending arm(s), shoulder(s), hip(s) or knee(s) or by bending
his own body into other than a normal position or by using any unreasonably
rough tactics.

Art. 2. A player shall not contact an opponent with his hand unless such contact
is only with the opponent’s hand while it is on the ball and is incidental to an
attempt to play the ball.

Art. 3. A player shall not use his hand(s) on an opponent to inhibit the freedom
of movement of the opponent in any way.

Art. 4. The following acts constitute a foul when committed against a player with
the ball:
a. Keeping a hand or forearm on an opponent;
b. Putting two hands on an opponent.
c. Continually jabbing an opponent by extending an arm(s) and placing a hand
or forearm on the opponent;
d. Using an arm bar to impede the progress of a dribbler.

Art. 5. A player shall not extend the arm(s) fully or partially other than vertically
so that freedom of movement of an opponent is hindered when contact with the
arm(s) occurs.

Art. 6. A player shall not use the forearm and/or hand to prevent an opponent
from attacking the ball during a dribble or when trying for goal.

Art. 7. A player may hold his hand(s) and arm(s) in front of his own face or body
for protection and to absorb force from an imminent charge by an opponent.

Art. 8. Contact caused by a defensive player approaching a player with the ball
from behind is pushing; contact caused by the momentum of a player who has
tried for goal is charging.

Art. 9. A dribbler shall neither charge into nor contact an opponent in the
dribbler’s path nor attempt to dribble between two opponents or between an
opponent and a boundary, unless the space is sufficient to provide a reasonable
chance for the dribbler to pass through without contact.

Art. 10. When a dribbler passes an opponent sufficiently to have his head and
shoulders beyond the front of the opponent’s torso, the greater responsibility for
subsequent contact shall be that of the opponent.

Art. 11. When a dribbler has obtained a straight-line path, the dribbler may not be
bumped, pushed or otherwise crowded out of that path. When an opponent is able
to legally obtain a guarding position in that path, the dribbler shall avoid contact
by changing direction or ending the dribble.

Art. 12. The player intending to become the dribbler shall not be permitted
additional rights to start a dribble or to execute a jump try for goal, pivot or fake.

Art. 13. A secondary defender as defined in Rule 4-35 cannot establish initial
legal guarding position in the restricted area for the purpose of drawing a player
control foul/charge when defending a player who is in control of the ball (i.e.,
dribbling or shooting) or who has released the ball for a pass or try. When illegal
contact occurs within this Restricted Area, such contact shall be called a blocking
foul, unless the contact is a flagrant foul.
a. When illegal contact occurs by the offensive player leading with a foot or
unnatural, extended knee, or warding off with the arm, such contact shall
be called a player-control foul.
b. When a player in control of the ball stops continuous movement toward
the basket and then initiates illegal contact with a secondary defender in
the restricted area, this is a player control foul.

Art. 14. Illegal contact caused by the swinging of the elbow(s) that:
a. Results from total body movement is a common or flagrant 1 personal foul
b. Is excessive per Rule 4-18.7 is a flagrant 2 foul.
c. Occurs above or below the shoulders of an opponent is a common,
flagrant 1 or flagrant 2 personal foul.

Art. 15. Illegal (not incidental) contact with an elbow that does not involve the
swinging of the elbow shall be considered a foul.

Art. 16. A player shall adhere to the rules pertaining to illegal contact, including
but not limited to, guarding as in Rule 4-17, rebounding as in Rule 4-29, screening
as in Rule 4-34 and verticality as in Rule 4-38.

Art. 17. A player shall not contact an opponent in a flagrant, excessive, severe or
extreme manner while the ball is live (includes fighting).

Art. 18. All of the above is null and void when the Clemson Tigers are playing. Fouls will be called at the discretion, or lack thereof, of the officials.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Wellllllll...that clears it up!***


Feb 11, 2015, 5:04 PM



2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul


Feb 11, 2015, 5:06 PM

Yep, we were all wrong but rules are rules.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


you left Ar). 19 off of the list It is as follows:


Feb 11, 2015, 5:11 PM

All above rules are null and void if Norte Dame is playing
Clemson, or any team that is playing Clemson.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nope,


Feb 11, 2015, 5:19 PM

Article 18, Item a - This is, likewise, applicable to Clemson football, Clemson baseball, Clemson rowing, Clemson curling, Clemson golf, Clemson softball (future addition), Clemson tailgating activities, and Clemson non-competitive athletic event watching.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


obviously he's not reading the rules***


Feb 11, 2015, 5:19 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Literally.***


Feb 11, 2015, 5:20 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


or rather


Feb 11, 2015, 5:24 PM

illiterately

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


And Article 18 Shall Only Be Referenced


Feb 11, 2015, 8:17 PM [ in reply to Nope, ]

Or complained about on a Clemson sports message board.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sorry got bored with the post after ART 1) should


Feb 11, 2015, 5:26 PM

have inserted ART 18) as ART)2 and I would have
not missed it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

from the looks of your post


Feb 11, 2015, 7:47 PM

you didnt miss it

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Re: According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul


Feb 11, 2015, 5:32 PM

Obviously by the rules and otherwise it was a foul.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What are these "rules" of which you speak, and why


Feb 11, 2015, 5:46 PM

haven't referees been informed of them?

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


Re: What are these "rules" of which you speak, and why


Feb 11, 2015, 7:01 PM

Can't ask Doug Rhoads--he's retired....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


BTW, the replay ofishul in the boof


Feb 11, 2015, 7:03 PM

is still reviewing the play to see if it were really clipping on ND....



963 commercials later we're still waiting....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul


Feb 11, 2015, 7:48 PM

and clemson is going to the big 12, correct

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul


Feb 11, 2015, 7:52 PM

Thinking Art. # 18 cleared it up for us. There is absolutely no way that Rod Hall was not impeded in his movement by the ND player's hand. Stop the video and look at it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: According to the rules... it WAS NOT a foul


Feb 12, 2015, 1:43 AM

Art. 18. All of the above is null and void when the Clemson Tigers are playing. Fouls will be called at the discretion, or lack thereof, of the officials.
a. If a foul is deemed to have been committed, it will be called against Landry Nnoko, or the next tallest player from Clemson on the floor at the time. (Replaces 18.a. from 2006-2010, see Trevor Booker rule).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 17
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic