|
Replies: 21
| visibility 901
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 9:58 PM
|
|
Everyone seems to be forgetting what happened in 2016.
Penn State won the big 10 conference championship. They were ranked, I believe, above OSU, but it was OSU that made the playoff, not PSU.
OSU was considered to be a better team than PSU. OSU had the loss early in the season. However, the point is this.... The committee decided to pick a team OVER a team that was a conference champion. They can, and probably will, pick someone over fsu, even if fsu wins. Without their best QB, they are not a top 4 team.
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [118]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 97
Joined: 5/7/22
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:00 PM
|
|
Pretty Sure Penn State was not undefeated so not the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1514]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2317
Joined: 1/14/05
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:18 PM
|
|
So you even know what you are arguing in favor of? If so, kindly state it because I think you'll realize I your statement was more the product of trying to make yourself look good at someone else's expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:26 PM
|
|
Ok. Again
FSU could win tonight. They would be undefeated.
They look horrible. They aren't a top 4 team.
In 2016, OSU was considered the better team than PSU, even though PSU was conference champion.
If FSU wins tonight, they will still be left out, because they don't look like a top 4 team.
And because there is sec bias, FSU will be left out
Who am I trying to make look bad? No one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8074]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6817
Joined: 10/16/09
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:01 PM
|
|
Totally new committee now. No one that was on the 2016 committee is on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:06 PM
|
|
Of course the committee is different. The point is that there is a precedent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23112]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19813
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Precedent was , 2 loss CC didn't get in
Dec 2, 2023, 10:07 PM
|
|
DA
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: Precedent was , 2 loss CC didn't get in
Dec 2, 2023, 10:16 PM
|
|
Point is , conference champ isn't automatic
Coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7024]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4374
Joined: 1/26/10
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:02 PM
|
|
This isn't similar at all. OSU wasn't undefeated
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7024]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4374
Joined: 1/26/10
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:02 PM
|
|
And neither was Penn State
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [118]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 97
Joined: 5/7/22
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:04 PM
|
|
It even looks like Penn State had two losses not just one. So no comparison at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
1
Dec 2, 2023, 10:07 PM
|
|
It does relate. Penn St was the conference champion, but was left out. Anyone claiming that a conference champion is automatic is completely wrong. FSU could win and not make it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1990
Joined: 9/23/07
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:11 PM
|
|
no, we're claiming a 2-loss conference champ won't get any consideration, just like Bama wouldn't have if they had lost to Auburn. This is completely different, not even close
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [719]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 625
Joined: 12/1/21
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
1
Dec 2, 2023, 10:03 PM
|
|
Not even close to being a good comparison. The committee was left comparing a 2 loss conference champion against a 1 loss runner up. They chose the team with only 1 loss. If FSU wins, they are an UNDEFEATED POWER 5 CONFERENCE CHAMPION being compared to a one loss conference champion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:14 PM
|
|
I guess we will see. Everyone wants to claim a conference champion is an automatic, but it isn't. Penn State won, but because the committee believed OSU was better, they put them in. FSU, even if they win, looks horrible with #3 QB. FSU could win, be undefeated, and my money is they will be left out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23112]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19813
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Penn Stae lost 2 games
Dec 2, 2023, 10:04 PM
|
|
The lost to Pitt.
Pitt beat the BIG Champs and the National Champs that year
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [523]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 451
Joined: 8/5/22
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:04 PM
|
|
Penn State was 11-2 and Ohio State was 11-1. If PSU was 12-1 they would’ve been in over them without question
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1999]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2151
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:14 PM
|
|
Didn't realize you were on the committee that year
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [523]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 451
Joined: 8/5/22
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:04 PM
|
|
Penn State was 11-2 and Ohio State was 11-1. If PSU was 12-1 they would’ve been in over them without question
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [523]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 451
Joined: 8/5/22
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee is selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:05 PM
|
|
Penn State was 11-2 and Ohio State was 11-1. If PSU was 12-1 they would’ve been in over them without question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [876]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 906
Joined: 9/9/13
|
Re: 2016 cfp committee selections
Dec 2, 2023, 10:21 PM
|
|
Penn State had 2 losses. OSU had one loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4071]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2942
Joined: 11/30/98
|
The truth is, FSU wasnt
Dec 2, 2023, 10:22 PM
|
|
A top four team with Travis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 901
|
|
|
50
