So Clemson and FSU have their cards on the table regarding the ACC.

May 15, 2024, 9:22 AM

Baby Blue has an internal power struggle with some long term ties to the ACC versus those that have read the giant print addition tea leaves who know that the money advantage of the B1g and SEC will soon encompass every sport, including the Heels beloved basketball.

My question: What is Miami thinking? Surely they don't believe they can compete long term with the huge advantage the power two now command. Marcus Camping World can promise all the NIL money he wants, he can't win the long game against TAMU, OSU, Oregon, etc when they have the conference payout advantages coupled with huge money donors in their large alumni pool. Is DRad really that blind? If so, I'm so glad he now sports a U rather than a paw.

Is anyone else in the ACC even awake? Personally, I would love to see the woolfies regulated to D2 level play because they refused to get on board. I also hope the gold domers stick to their guns as an independent in FB and with the rise of a power two and can find no one to schedule. Maybe TD Jesus can actually become a religious symbol again.

UVA has the academic chops to join Northwestern as an afterthought in the B1G.

Wake, VaTech, Cuse, BC, will anyone really miss them?

Sorry: Didn't mean to omit Louisville and Pitt.

Louisville and Pitt, does geography make you a B1G fit? Does geography even matter anymore?

GT can likely gain a spot in the SEC and play Vandy each year for the SEC academic A+ trophy.

SMU, Cal, Stanford, what were you thinking hitching your wagon to the ACC's dying horse?

Duke, where do you fit? The Big East as a Bball conference sounds like a good fit. You could play a one game football schedule every year against UConn for the conference football title and the automatic bid to, well nothing really.

Message was edited by: revmarkg®

Message was edited by: revmarkg®