Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
I'm surprised the fact that the ball hit BC player first
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 9
| visibility 1

I'm surprised the fact that the ball hit BC player first


Nov 14, 2018, 8:09 PM

before Amari wasn't reviewable.

I thought I've seen them review that before on a punt.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It is.


Nov 14, 2018, 8:31 PM

One person on here besides me has brought this up. I'm surprised that more people on TNet didn't pick up on it. The fact that the replay officials didn't catch it is just further proof of the total incompetence of ACC officiating. The same could be said for the crack ESPN announcers.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It is.


Nov 14, 2018, 8:37 PM

The espn announcer s said after several reviews that it should have been called and the retired official who gives his opinion also said it should have been called

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hit our player twice then bounced right into


Nov 14, 2018, 8:50 PM

arms of returner.

badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Hit our player twice then bounced right into


Nov 14, 2018, 9:28 PM

Wrong punt. Not the BC return. The one ruled a muff by Amari.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

silly me but..


Nov 14, 2018, 8:38 PM

someone clarify the rules. I thought if the kick team touched the ball it was down BUT cannot interfere with the returner (as the BC kick team clearly did, then it is interference with the returner and a penalty).

Apparently I am incorrect as our team touched the ball on our punt to BC that they picked up and returned for a touchdown. I thought the ball was down if the kick team touched it. If not, this could actually be a weapon if played correctly...

Please help an old addled Tiger out here.

Go Tigers!!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Let's say Clemson punts. It hits our player first then


Nov 14, 2018, 8:43 PM

The opposing team grabs it and runs with it. That's legal.

But if the opposing returner fumbles. Then it's still the opposing team ball at the point where Clemson touched it.

So it's in fact a free return. Weird rule.

So for Amari... He was interfered with. But ALSO...the ball hit BC player just before it hit Amari. That's what ESPN, Dabo, everyone failed to mention because we were so caught up in the missed interference call.

Regardless of interference, it should've been Clemson ball where it hit BC player. That "illegal touching" is also reviewable. The interference is not reviewable.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If the kicking team touches the ball first, the returner can


Nov 14, 2018, 8:44 PM [ in reply to silly me but.. ]

Pick the ball up without any consequences and attempt to return it. If he fumbles the ball, it will not result in a turnover.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Thanks to yall for the clarification!


Nov 14, 2018, 8:52 PM

Go Tigers!!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And, as usual, Ron Cheery's boys are off


Nov 14, 2018, 9:58 PM

the hook.


Tx, Swoffie

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 9
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Meeting my mother for the first time

by Clemsonohiotiger®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic