Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Both players passed a lie detector test.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 2,226

Both players passed a lie detector test.


May 24, 2019, 10:20 AM

Do you know how unlikely it would be for both of them to be lying and still both be able to pass a lie detector test?

These kids are innocent. It’s a crying shame their lives are forever altered.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Anyone can pass a basic polygraph


May 24, 2019, 10:42 AM

It just measures stress levels for basic answers so you step on a tack/do anything to artificially raise stress levels when telling the truth to create a high baseline. Watch almost any movie or tv show ever regarding law enforcement.

Not saying they’re lying as I don’t think they are. But the results of a polygraph are largely meaningless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't know wouldn't you expect one of them to fail at


May 24, 2019, 1:21 PM

Least if they lied? They are 20 year olds not some CIA spies

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You don’t have to be a CIA spy to pass


May 24, 2019, 1:33 PM

And they both had a lawyer which I’m 1000% sure would be familiar enough with polygraphs to coach someone how to beat it. It’s a pretty common defense attorney tactic.

IMO the polygraph doesn’t mean anything, the multiple clean tests before and after are the evidence that supports their innocence. If the school could prove that they had no trace of Ostarine in their system in their November test, and just a small trace in December, then it would be a logical conclusion that it was a contaminant that had no impact. That’s giving the NCAA too much credit for thinking they could think logically.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

... and an average person DOESN'T just pass a polygraph...


May 24, 2019, 5:10 PM

To think otherwise is total BS.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Both players passed a lie detector test.


May 24, 2019, 1:28 PM

I so not know how unlikely it would be for both of them to be lying and still both be able to pass a lie detector test.

Sounds like you know. How unlikely would it be?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Both players passed a lie detector test.


May 24, 2019, 1:42 PM

I'm just gonna guess. Not very likely

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If polygraphs were reliable they would be admissible


May 24, 2019, 1:35 PM

in courts.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The NCAA isn’t accusing them of lying. All they care about


May 24, 2019, 3:34 PM

... is that a banned substance was found in their bodies.

How it got there is apparently immaterial to the NCAA.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The NCAA isn’t accusing them of lying. All they care about


May 24, 2019, 3:40 PM

I know someone very well that works for a federal agency (think spy type stuff) and they are given a polygraph every two years. No one there taking it or administering the polygraph think it is a waste of time.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The NCAA isn’t accusing them of lying. All they care about


May 24, 2019, 4:56 PM

The only reason it’s a waste of time in this case is because (as I said) the NCAA isn’t accusing the players of lying about how they got Osterine in their system. All they care about is that it was detected and it’s banned. A lie detector test would not help exonerate the players.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

...and that is the reason the NCAA ruling is total BS...


May 24, 2019, 5:17 PM

The "trace amounts" ruling is an antiquated pile... The big boys of monitoring doping have already addressed it. The NCAA is a slack bunch of lazy A-holes who can't keep up. They're just taking the easy route without consideration of the overall circumstance. Their day is coming.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 11
| visibility 2,226
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Meeting my mother for the first time

by Clemsonohiotiger®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic