McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
Commissioner [907]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 984
Joined: 10/10/11
|
McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 6:04 PM
|
|
What's McChumps' recruiting angle if Feaster plays well?
What if Feaster stinks it up? Then what does he say?
What if Feaster doesn't get drafted?
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2081]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2407
Joined: 9/4/16
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 6:09 PM
|
|
I think the main problem for Feaster is that there OL is not very good.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3981]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 5094
Joined: 8/23/16
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 6:24 PM
|
|
Feaster was maybe the most overrated player at Clemson while he was hear in recent memory. They guy was decent at best. This offseason though people are acting like he was Barry Sanders or something
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1222]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1724
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 8:14 PM
|
|
Feaster is and dang good runningback. His explosiveness is impressive. His only issue is that he's behind a Heisman contender. If ETN were to go down, I wouldn't sweat it knowing that Feaster was behind him.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 8:50 PM
|
|
You do know that Feaster wasn't second string either right? We're not even sure he was a solid third string, as it seems Rencher, Mellusi, and Dukes all made big strides. Last year, even though he got the second most carries, he finished fourth in stats as well. He was pretty overrated. I'm also not convinced he's better than that Dowdle they have there (who had only .2 ypc less last year, despite being hurt, playing behind a horrendous offensive line, and going up against much better rushing defenses), who is their starter at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5072]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5618
Joined: 8/17/03
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 3:53 PM
|
|
Just making up crap like this doesn’t make any of it true.
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [578]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 908
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 19, 2019, 12:25 AM
[ in reply to Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year ] |
|
You do know that Feaster wasn't second string either right? We're not even sure he was a solid third string, as it seems Rencher, Mellusi, and Dukes all made big strides. Last year, even though he got the second most carries, he finished fourth in stats as well. He was pretty overrated. I'm also not convinced he's better than that Dowdle they have there (who had only .2 ypc less last year, despite being hurt, playing behind a horrendous offensive line, and going up against much better rushing defenses), who is their starter at the moment.
With the exception of when he plays Clemson, I hope he accomplishes all his dreams.
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [578]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 908
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 19, 2019, 12:25 AM
[ in reply to Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year ] |
|
You do know that Feaster wasn't second string either right? We're not even sure he was a solid third string, as it seems Rencher, Mellusi, and Dukes all made big strides. Last year, even though he got the second most carries, he finished fourth in stats as well. He was pretty overrated. I'm also not convinced he's better than that Dowdle they have there (who had only .2 ypc less last year, despite being hurt, playing behind a horrendous offensive line, and going up against much better rushing defenses), who is their starter at the moment.
With the exception of when he plays Clemson, I hope he accomplishes all his dreams.
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [578]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 908
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 19, 2019, 12:25 AM
[ in reply to Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year ] |
|
You do know that Feaster wasn't second string either right? We're not even sure he was a solid third string, as it seems Rencher, Mellusi, and Dukes all made big strides. Last year, even though he got the second most carries, he finished fourth in stats as well. He was pretty overrated. I'm also not convinced he's better than that Dowdle they have there (who had only .2 ypc less last year, despite being hurt, playing behind a horrendous offensive line, and going up against much better rushing defenses), who is their starter at the moment.
With the exception of when he plays Clemson, I hope he accomplishes all his dreams.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2811]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1925
Joined: 1/9/11
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 19, 2019, 12:29 AM
[ in reply to Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year ] |
|
The third and fourth string backs usually were playing against the other teams backups...hence better stats. Feaster was and would be the second team back. He's definitely better than anything the Gamecocks have.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 2852
Joined: 2/14/03
|
it’s a “no win” for them. I honestly hope he does well, but
Aug 18, 2019, 6:23 PM
|
|
if does well we can always say “look what our third team RB did against the mighty SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54865]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58159
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: it’s a “no win” for them. I honestly hope he does well, but
Aug 18, 2019, 8:41 PM
|
|
That's a good oversight!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3134
Joined: 1/8/13
|
Re: McChump, Feaster, and coots recruiting next year
Aug 18, 2019, 8:58 PM
|
|
If Feaster gets 4ypc there it will make the coaches look bad and should negatively impact their recruiting. A 5* RB that got 6 YPC at Clemson majorly regressing....
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
|
|
|