Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Bama beats #16 24-0, AT HOME,we beat #17 27-7 on the road
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1,061

Bama beats #16 24-0, AT HOME,we beat #17 27-7 on the road


Nov 11, 2018, 12:13 AM

Throw in UGA beat #24 27-10 AT home. for even more perspective.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

but that's an ACC #17, not a SEC #16


Nov 11, 2018, 12:15 AM

there's a difference.



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: but that's an ACC #17, not a SEC #16


Nov 11, 2018, 12:36 AM

Plus Bama had the refs. BIG difference.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Anybody that says Coach Brownell is the best coach to come through Clemson is going to start an argument." -JP Hall


Re: Bama beats #16 24-0, AT HOME,we beat #17 27-7 on the road


Nov 11, 2018, 12:16 AM

I think we are in good shape. If we score two TDs instead of two FGs in the red zone, it’s another conversation entirely.

Message was edited by: NorthwestPurple®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Bama beats #16 24-0, AT HOME,we beat #17 27-7 on the road


Nov 11, 2018, 12:24 AM

Yeah but read the article on ESPN the "Takeaways from each Top 25 Teams". The lower half of Clemson's paragraph is bull manure. It's like they haven't watched any of the past 5 games. Clemson apparently can't have an off night but Bama and Georgia have similar wins and we get not one critique on their play. Bama's critique is they gave up a couple of big plays but they're Bama and have built the cache to not question them and I guess because Georgia was playing another SEC team that is their excuse. I mean they try and call out Clemson's punt return defense. It was the first punt return I have seen all year that the backups for the backups weren't in playing. I'm guessing the only other one ESPN can come up with is last weeks when Clemson was up 50 points and had player's mommas playing on Special Teams. I don't believe in the ESPN is bias against Clemson but that paragraph on Clemson has some bunk crud. Also I can't stand as a grown man I have to use the word crud and manure on a site that blocks words that aren't even curse words. Sorry just got worked up over that article and here I am commenting on others that are getting worked up over ESPN using the word "survive" to describe Clemson's win.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 1,061
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic