Replies: 14
| visibility 151
|
All-In [32743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14932
Joined: 6/29/11
|
Have we talked about - Epstein ? That world-class sicko was exposed to
2
Jan 14, 2024, 9:29 PM
|
|
VANITY FAIR in 1996 …… they whiffed on purpose on 1st hand accounts and let that doooooooshbag continue his predatory ways for 20 more years.
Does that happen today - with everyone chomping at the bit for clicks and views ???
Just finished ep 1 of the Netflix deal. Makes me wanna projectile vomit.
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [138519]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63984
Joined: 10/22/00
|
Is this a new doc? Or the one from a couple years ago?***
3
Jan 14, 2024, 9:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [104]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51
Joined: 8/7/22
|
Why are you so worried about it?
2
Jan 14, 2024, 9:41 PM
|
|
Sorry. I don’t belong here.
|
|
|
|
|
Lot o points [163012]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31933
Joined: 1/17/07
|
No, you don't.
8
8
Jan 14, 2024, 10:23 PM
|
|
Weirdasspost for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [138519]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63984
Joined: 10/22/00
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
When you were here before, couldn't look you in the eye.
2
Jan 16, 2024, 8:08 AM
[ in reply to Why are you so worried about it? ] |
|
You're just like an angel. Your skin makes me cry. You float like a feather in a beautiful world. I wish I was special. You're so f#ckin' special.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14932
Joined: 6/29/11
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53559]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21882
Joined: 11/16/05
|
Seems I've seen a few different versions for his bio, as well as Ghisline
1
Jan 14, 2024, 10:30 PM
|
|
And she had 2 or 3 different ones also.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4891]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 4912
Joined: 1/8/19
|
Re: Have we talked about - Epstein ? That world-class sicko was exposed to
Jan 15, 2024, 10:23 AM
|
|
To answer your question, yes it still happens today.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14932
Joined: 6/29/11
|
My question was - do media / mags / digital mags NOT rush to publish
1
Jan 15, 2024, 1:17 PM
|
|
anymore, in fear of missing out on clicks / views / notoriety ? ?
Vanity Fair magazine was doing a big spread on Epstein and discovered first hand testimony that Epstein was preying on young girls.
The editor-in-chief - who looked like Bozo the Clown - decided to go ahead and publish the article but told his folks to pull all content that was about him being involved in “questionable” activity with young girls.
So the article came out - making this sicko seem like some kinda mysterious, Gatsby, amazing guy.
Wouldn’t folks today RUSH to run this guy over - based on 2 credible witnesses giving very damning, first-hand testimony ? ?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [43582]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10637
Joined: 3/1/18
|
Dude was super rich, well-connected and had access to an army of lawyers,
1
Jan 15, 2024, 1:23 PM
|
|
so yes I think there would be some hesitation to make a public accusation without absolute proof.
They'd either be outing the witnesses, or publishing anonymous claims.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14932
Joined: 6/29/11
|
This was in 1996 - Vanity Fair reporter found 2 people to talk about it after
1
Jan 15, 2024, 2:12 PM
|
|
going to the FBI (they were told this wasn’t a NY thing - since it was in New Mexico and the island) and the FBI never got back to them.
1996.
A LOT of destruction could have been prevented.
IF what the docu is saying is true.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [43582]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10637
Joined: 3/1/18
|
Agree, but I get why they didn't go public. There was some intimidation, too,
1
Jan 15, 2024, 2:20 PM
|
|
I think. Didn't the editor find a severed cat head in his garden or something like that?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14932
Joined: 6/29/11
|
Yeah - somebody did. I'd take as a sign of good luck -
1
Jan 15, 2024, 2:34 PM
|
|
one less cat ……. ? ? ?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9302]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6395
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Re: Have we talked about - Epstein ? That world-class sicko was exposed to
Jan 16, 2024, 12:14 PM
|
|
VANITY FAIR in 1996 …… they whiffed on purpose on 1st hand accounts and let that doooooooshbag continue his predatory ways for 20 more years.
Does that happen today - with everyone chomping at the bit for clicks and views ???
Just finished ep 1 of the Netflix deal. Makes me wanna projectile vomit.
Yes, because of his "select" clientele
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 151
|
|
|