18 chatter(s) RIGHT NOW!   Go!    
 Mickey Plyler's Blog



Front Page
Sections
Football
Basketball
Baseball
Recruiting
InterActive
Forums
TgrActive Chat
T-Mail
Blogs
Edit Settings
Mem. Profiles
Tiger Poll
Features
Tiger Tickets
Multimedia
TigerNet Store


Tuesday January 22, 2008

Half Full-The Overhaul

Half Full-The Overhaul
One of my favorite TV shows is “Curb Your Enthusiasm” on HBO. It is an ad-libbed comedy about the life of Seinfeld creator Larry David. If you have not seen the show, I encourage you to rent or buy a past season or two on DVD. If you liked “Seinfeld”, you will enjoy “Curb Your Enthusiasm.”

The cover of the box set for the DVD of Season 3 of the show has the star, Larry David, starring at a glass of water. David is puzzled as he studies the glass that is either half full or half empty.

This leads me to today’s blog and the puzzle of Clemson basketball as it pertains to free throw shooting.

Many will point to a 10-23 effort that came out to 43.5% against Duke on Saturday. Believe me there is plenty of ammunition in the double barrel shotgun you can use to shoot negatives at the free throw shooting efforts of the Tigers. One could also point out the fact that Cliff Hammonds is now shooting 34.5% from the stripe. You could make the statement that the Tigers are shooting 63.1% from the line this season which is last in the ACC. You would also be able to factually point out that Clemson is currently ranked 280th out of 328 teams in Division I basketball in terms of free throw shooting.

All of those are true but only half of the story and the half empty version.

For us eternal optimists there is hope and positive news. The half full view would tell us a different story. This side would tell us that Clemson set the record last season for the lowest free throw shooting in ACC history with a 57.8% clip. Last season Clemson was ranked 324th out of 325 Division I teams in college basketball in free throw shooting so the optimist side in me says that the Tigers have improved 44 spots in terms of the stat from last year to this year.

Being the 280th best free throw shooting team in the country is nothing to be proud of but it is better than being number 325. I don’t like where we are but it is better than where we were.

Last year we all watched the 57.8% ACC record and 63.1% is nothing to be proud of but it is an improvement of 5.3%.

Half full is hard in terms of watching the Tigers shoot free throws but that is the attitude I have chosen. In fact I think the entire program needs to take the same approach. I think the entire program needs to have an overhaul in this area.

Free throw shooting has to do with some mechanics and some technique. Balance, form, rotation, rhythm and other factors should certainly be paid attention to in full detail. But confidence is the most important part of the equation. Confidence is the biggest factor in Hammonds shooting 34.5%. He has issues in his form but Hammonds is better than 34.5%. As a freshman he shot 65% from the line. As a sophomore he dropped to 57% but last year he improved to 64%. Coming into this season Hammonds was a career 62% free throw shooter. This is not good for a guard but is 28% higher than he is shooting this season.

Confidence has to be the only explanation for K.C. Rivers struggles at the line this season. As a freshman Rivers was 21 of 25 from the line which comes out to 84%. His 74% last season was a drop off but still above average and respectable. This year he is shooting just 65% from the line or 11% lower than his career average of 76% he was shooting coming into this season.

This free throw shooting thing has taken on a life of its own so again I believe a complete overhaul is needed. While some of the Tigers have some mechanical issues with their free throws, I maintain that most of the problems now are mental.

As fans we can be part of the problem or part of the solution. I believe we can do the following things to help:

1. Whenever the Tigers miss a free throw we should not sigh and moan. This is a negative energy that only adds pressure to the next attempt.

2. If the Tigers miss a few in a row then make one, we should not give the sarcastic applause or applaud with relief. Again, this only contributes to the perception.

3. We need to cheer louder on defense to make up for our inefficiencies in other areas. If we accept that our free throws cannot be counted on then we can move forward and be positive to help in an area where we do excel. If Clemson cannot win a game on the free throw line then we must try to help them win in another area.

4. We need to stop spending so much time talking about it in negative terms. The negative energy resonates around Littlejohn, the campus and the community. We need to stop thinking about it and talking about it. The players know they are struggling but don’t need to be reminded of it.

Maybe we should turn to the serenity prayer which asks:

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Everyone’s attitude must change. We need to will the ball in the basket. We need to have positive emotion and energy as the next Tiger steps to the free throw line. We need to have the attitude that when teams foul Clemson then we will make them pay at the line instead of holding our breath in anticipation of another miss. We need to stroll to the free throw line with some swagger.

OK. Here is the half full part of me and the optimist speaking. I personally guarantee three things for Clemson basketball:

1. Clemson will beat Wake Forest tonight.

2. The Tigers will shoot at least 66% from the free throw line for the season.

3. Oliver Purnell will have his club in the NCAA tournament.

Power of positive thinking will prevail. It’s all about confidence and it all starts tonight. I am not going to dwell on the negatives anymore in terms of our free throws. Starting tonight we can overhaul the entire mindset.

Who’s with me?



864-834-6060


The Brad Hughes All-State Insurance Agency










Comments:

To add to the glass is half full optimism, our underclassmen are shooting 72% from the line while upperclassmen are shooting 54% from the line. I know its a little down the road, but I think Purnell will get free throw shooting under control.

Posted by msawyer33 on January 22, 2008 at 11:16 AM EST #

nswayer33,

Great point. I did not know that stat. Thanks for the positive info.

Posted by Mickey Plyler on January 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM EST #

Mickey ---

I am not one who is paranoid about any specific conspiracy against Clemson. I do, however believe that Duke is routinely allowed to play with a defensive intensity that gives them an edge in conference games.

In recent years, we have seen very clearly that this sort of edge, when missing on a neutral court with officals from other conference, often results in Duke losing games.

It's a sad, sad situation when I can honestly say that I would rather Clemson face Duke on a neutral court with officials from another conference, than to play at home in Littlejohn with ACC officials.

Posted by apextiger on January 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM EST #

Serenity now! Serenity now!

Mickey, you should add a disclaimer about "Curb Your Enthusiasm" -- it is a LOT more vulgar and direct that Seinfeld. Though similar (because Larry David wrote and produced Seinfeld), it pushes the line if you are not up for crude comments. My dad loves Seinfeld but I know he would HATE Curb Your Enthusiasm.

Also, I love your blogs, but when does football season start again??

Posted by RobertsonCU on January 22, 2008 at 12:07 PM EST #

I've tried but I just can't curb my enthusiasim for better free throw shooting. However, we lost at duke because a) the refs did us no favors, b) once the refs screwed us we got flustered and tossed a bunch of turn-overs. Had we played more in control, we would have had a close game at the end.

Posted by Tiger Guy on January 22, 2008 at 12:26 PM EST #

I'm with you brotha.

Posted by 90Orange on January 22, 2008 at 01:00 PM EST #

The guys you mentioned are fairly typical and this predates OP and LS. The longer they are in the program the worse their ft %. You have to start with a great % like Stitt to get someone adequate by the time they are a senior. I have no idea why this is.

Our big men are not great ft shooters. We need to figure this out because going inside so they get fouled and sent to the line is not going to help us catch up or keep a lead - statistically speaking.

Once during the RB era they beat Duke and only missed on ft as a team. They had devoted an entire practice to ft's that week. Work with the ft consultant, devote a practice to fts, try something anything. After all what is there to mess up.

Not bashing the kids. I know they are trying. We just need to do something that will help them to improve.

Posted by 74TIGER on January 22, 2008 at 01:28 PM EST #

Call Dr. Mo Pickens!

Posted by Old Green+Tom on January 22, 2008 at 01:44 PM EST #

Old Green+Tom,
I now Dr. Pickens well. He has worked with several sports at Clemson. I will check and see if the men's basketball team has utitlized his talents yet.

Posted by Mickey Plyler on January 22, 2008 at 01:45 PM EST #

Mickey,

At the risk of being a math nerd, you're selling our free throw improvement short.

A 57.8% to 63.1% improvement is actually a 9.2% increase...

Posted by reflux on January 22, 2008 at 01:52 PM EST #

The poor free throw shooting has an effect further reaching than just purely lost points....by consistently not being a factor on the line, it allows other teams to be much more aggresive defensively vs. the Tigers. There is littl fear of fouling Clemson, outside of getting in foul trouble.

Teams can play Clemson with much more toughness than normal, leading to more turnovers.

Posted by Justwannaread on January 22, 2008 at 02:09 PM EST #

The poor free throw shooting has an effect further reaching than just purely lost points....by consistently not being a factor on the line, it allows other teams to be much more aggresive defensively vs. the Tigers. There is littl fear of fouling Clemson, outside of getting in foul trouble.

Teams can play Clemson with much more toughness than normal, leading to more turnovers.

Posted by Justwannaread on January 22, 2008 at 02:15 PM EST #

Nice optimism, but we havent beat one tournament team all year. How good are we really?

Posted by drock4484 on January 22, 2008 at 02:21 PM EST #

The thing about free throw shooting that people always tend to forget is that you need 1 or 2 guys to shoot well when you are trying to protect a lead late in the game. The problem with our team last year was when we tried to protect a lead, they would foul our PG (Vernon) who shot below 50%, he would usually miss and they would get free possessions.

I feel a lot better about having Still and TO to handle the ball at the end of games and ice it for us.

Posted by clemsonguy2 on January 22, 2008 at 03:43 PM EST #

I don't understand why Purnell lets a guys who has poor technique shoot it that way. If he is making 70%, then he can shoot it anyway he wants. But there are only 2 Tigers with a minimum of 20 FTA's this season that shoot better than 70% on our team (Oglesby and Stitt - and they are both north of 80% at present). You have to make a guy shoot it with proper technique if he is not making them. That is a coaching blunder, and Purnell should shoulder some of the blame on this.

Posted by 95paw on January 22, 2008 at 10:41 PM EST #

I don't understand why Purnell lets a guys who has poor technique shoot it that way. If he is making 70%, then he can shoot it anyway he wants. But there are only 2 Tigers with a minimum of 20 FTA's this season that shoot better than 70% on our team (Oglesby and Stitt - and they are both north of 80% at present). You have to make a guy shoot it with proper technique if he is not making them. That is a coaching blunder, and Purnell should shoulder some of the blame on this.

Posted by 95paw on January 22, 2008 at 10:47 PM EST #

I don't understand why Purnell lets a guys who has poor technique shoot it that way. If he is making 70%, then he can shoot it anyway he wants. But there are only 2 Tigers with a minimum of 20 FTA's this season that shoot better than 70% on our team (Oglesby and Stitt - and they are both north of 80% at present). You have to make a guy shoot it with proper technique if he is not making them. That is a coaching blunder, and Purnell should shoulder some of the blame on this.

Posted by 95paw on January 22, 2008 at 10:57 PM EST #

Mickey,

You may not remember but Dale Davis was an abyssmal free throw shooter when he got here. However, his Senior year (I think) he made a major improvement. You can probably go back and get the facts if you want. I can still remember Cliff Ellis standing and applauding for Dale before every free throw attempt encouraging him. I don't know if it was mechanics or what but I am sure that Cliff's positive reinforcement aided the effort.

Posted by perk80 on January 23, 2008 at 08:23 AM EST #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Archives
Search
Links



Front Page | Football | Basketball | Baseball | Recruiting
Account Settings | TigerActive Chat | TigerNet Forums | Tiger Tickets | T-Mail

Please mail any comments, corrections or suggestions
Disclaimer and Privacy Statement Copyright © 1995-2008 TigerNet

Interested in advertising on TigerNet?